Works fine with my Intel HD Graphics 630 (on i7-7700K) at 2560x1440@60Hz.
Full-screen glxgears uses the CPU and runs at only 3 fps, though.
Max
Hi!
I have seen it number of times but haven't had time to investigate it
further. I have another ugly workaround to fix it. In my case it
happens because the route to the syslog target is learned via bgp and
the bgp is not up when syslogd tries to send first message. Your patch
fixes it.
Rivo
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:44:51 +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> A customer has seen a "Can't assign requested address" error from
> syslogd(8) at boot time and then sending messages per UDP did not
> work. It is a carp(4) setup.
>
> So I would suggest to add EADDRNOTAVAIL to the error numbers that
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:16:24AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:40:26AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > > Even on modern amd64s integer arithmetics and bitwise operations are
> > > faster
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:07:39PM +, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 12/09/17(Tue) 11:09, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > My previous attempt to grab the NET_LOCK(), thus potentially sleeping,
> > inside kqueue_scan() resulting in NULL dereferences:
> >
Hi,
A customer has seen a "Can't assign requested address" error from
syslogd(8) at boot time and then sending messages per UDP did not
work. It is a carp(4) setup.
So I would suggest to add EADDRNOTAVAIL to the error numbers that
are ignored when doing UDP sendto(2). Otherwise syslogd would
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:28:42AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:16:24AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:40:26AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > > > Even on
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:16:24AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:40:26AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > > Even on modern amd64s integer arithmetics and bitwise operations are
> > > faster
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:40:26AM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > Even on modern amd64s integer arithmetics and bitwise operations are
> > faster (and more precise in many cases) than floating point
> > equivalents.
>
>
