add new cubox and hummingboard dtbs to armv7 miniroot/ramdisk

2018-03-14 Thread Jonathan Gray
As of U-Boot 2018.03 the mx6cuboxi U-Boot image may attempt to load imx6q-hummingboard2.dtb imx6dl-hummingboard2.dtb imx6q-hummingboard.dtb imx6dl-hummingboard.dtb imx6q-cubox-i.dtb imx6dl-cubox-i.dtb dtbs for rev 1.5 soms will be loaded automatically at some point in the future

Re: ipmi at acpi

2018-03-14 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:58:14PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > Hi, > > I have some hardware where IPMI is not found using the SMBIOS table > anymore but using ACPI. These show up in the dmesg as > > "IPI0001" at acpi0 not configured > > The driver basically reads the information out of ACPI

ipmi at acpi

2018-03-14 Thread Patrick Wildt
Hi, I have some hardware where IPMI is not found using the SMBIOS table anymore but using ACPI. These show up in the dmesg as "IPI0001" at acpi0 not configured The driver basically reads the information out of ACPI and then runs the normal IPMI attach code. It's an attachment driver, no

Re: netinet6 - bcopy -> memcpy

2018-03-14 Thread Florian Obser
OK florian@ for after unlock On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:40:24PM -0400, David Hill wrote: > Hello - > > A few bcopy to memcpy conversions where the memory does not overlap. > > OK? > > Index: netinet6/icmp6.c > === > RCS file:

Re: Bugfix: acme-client 301 redirect issue

2018-03-14 Thread Sebastian Benoit
ok Florian Obser(flor...@openbsd.org) on 2018.03.14 08:15:35 +0100: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:08:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2018/03/11 17:52, Florian Obser wrote: > > > > > > I think we should just follow the 301. > > > > I didn't hear back from @letsencrypt_ops about why

[PATCH] remove unused struct member

2018-03-14 Thread Kevin Lo
Hi, This diff removes an unused member sc_iface_number of the softc. Ok? Index: sys/dev/usb/uticom.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/uticom.c,v retrieving revision 1.32 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.32 uticom.c --- sys/dev/usb/uticom.c

Re: Bugfix: acme-client 301 redirect issue

2018-03-14 Thread Florian Obser
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:08:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/03/11 17:52, Florian Obser wrote: > > > > I think we should just follow the 301. > > I didn't hear back from @letsencrypt_ops about why they were > issue 301s, but I do agree it makes sense to follow them. update diff