On 2018/04/01 08:59, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I think this is the right thing to do, but needs handling in conjunction
> > with changes to PF, which has dual queue-setting (IPTOS_LOWDELAY packets
>
> pf has to change first??
>
> I don't understand the requirement that pf must be capable of handli
On 28.3.2018. 11:42, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with this diff i'm getting 1.43Mpps on
> 12 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz, 2400.01 MHz
>
> with plain kernel i'm getting 1.12Mpps and with older diff's i was
> getting 1.31Mpps ...
On box with 6 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-264
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 01:41:00PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 01:04:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > The only worry about converting from iov to dprintf could be some
> > > atomicity requirement. I don't really see that in play here, I think
> > > the iov uses wa
A popular choice for adding serial ports (UARTs) to SoCs is to copy
and paste some Syopsys Designware "IP" into the design. These ports
are almost, but not quite, compatible with the NS16550. The main
difference is that this "IP" can be synthesized with different
register widths and layouts to ca
> I think this is the right thing to do, but needs handling in conjunction
> with changes to PF, which has dual queue-setting (IPTOS_LOWDELAY packets
pf has to change first??
I don't understand the requirement that pf must be capable of handling
this naunce of packets, before any of our applicati
On 2018/04/01 13:29, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 11:29:55AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2018/03/31 16:10, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > TL;DR: I propose to update the defaults to use DSCP "AF21" (Low
> > > Latency Data) for interactive session traffic, and CS1 ("Lower
> > >
* Martin Pieuchot [2018-02-23 10:04]:
> On 23/02/18(Fri) 04:08, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Martin Pieuchot [2018-02-21 09:37]:
> > > On 21/02/18(Wed) 02:37, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > > I'd suggest moving the pool allocation and the function in net/pf*.c
> > > and only have a function call under
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 11:29:55AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/03/31 16:10, Job Snijders wrote:
> > TL;DR: I propose to update the defaults to use DSCP "AF21" (Low
> > Latency Data) for interactive session traffic, and CS1 ("Lower
> > Effort") for non-interactive traffic. This applies
On 2018/03/31 16:10, Job Snijders wrote:
> TL;DR: I propose to update the defaults to use DSCP "AF21" (Low Latency
> Data) for interactive session traffic, and CS1 ("Lower Effort") for
> non-interactive traffic. This applies to both IPv4 and IPv6.
I think this is the right thing to do, but needs h
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 11:09:18AM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:39:39AM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> >
> > > On a backbone router with many interfaces route show scrolls for quite
> > > some time and i
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:39:39AM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
>
> > On a backbone router with many interfaces route show scrolls for quite
> > some time and it is difficult to see at a glance what is going on.
> >
> > Colour coding
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:39:39AM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> On a backbone router with many interfaces route show scrolls for quite
> some time and it is difficult to see at a glance what is going on.
>
> Colour coding is an obvious improvement.
>
> The following diff sets the background col
On a backbone router with many interfaces route show scrolls for quite
some time and it is difficult to see at a glance what is going on.
Colour coding is an obvious improvement.
The following diff sets the background colour to green for up routes
and black for down routes.
The default route has
13 matches
Mail list logo
