Hi,
From: YASUOKA Masahiko
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:46:10 +0900 (JST)
> initialize new line.
>
> See #1086, "lastline" is set to previous lastline. Then new line is not
> initialized.
>
> I think the following diff is better since it initializes the line in
> the same way for first line.
>
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:00:14 +0900 (JST)
Masato Asou wrote:
> When I use /usr/bin/bc command with MALLOC_OPTIONS=UJ, SEGV was
> occurred in libedit.
>
> $ MALLOC_OPTIONS=UJ /usr/bin/bc
> 10 + 20 + 30 + 40 + 50 + 60 + 70 + 80 +
> 90 + Segmentation fault (c
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:00:14 +0900, Masato Asou wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/libedit/refresh.c b/lib/libedit/refresh.c
> index f2d001d67cb..5f2d607d356 100644
> --- a/lib/libedit/refresh.c
> +++ b/lib/libedit/refresh.c
> @@ -1061,6 +1061,7 @@ re_fastputc(EditLine *el, wint_t c)
>
> terminal__
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 09:44:35PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On May 14 we did split kernel spinning time from system time. Goal
> was to see what the kernel is doing.
>
> I just realized that user land time accounting has also changed.
> The commit changed system time of a process
Hi,
When I use /usr/bin/bc command with MALLOC_OPTIONS=UJ, SEGV was
occurred in libedit.
$ MALLOC_OPTIONS=UJ /usr/bin/bc
10 + 20 + 30 + 40 + 50 + 60 + 70 + 80 + 90
+ Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ /usr/bin/gdb /usr/bin/bc bc.core
GNU gdb 6.3
... snip ...
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> An excellent (although secondary) source from the precambrian era,
>Morris I Bolsky
>"The /vi/ User's Hanbdbook"
>(c) 1984 by Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated
>(c) 1985 by AT&T Technologies, Inc
>published by Prentice-Hal
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 01:02:11PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> According to https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/3106, Coverity thinks
> I made a copy and paste error regarding one of the augment calls in
> RBT_REMOVE. I'm inclined to agree.
>
> The augment code is only used by uvm_map.c, and it
