Hi
Any updates?
Deface писал 18.10.2018 00:02:
Hi all,
The patch in attachment works fine for me and fixes the
[ERROR: ATH0 UNABLE TO RESET HARDWARE] issue that I had on my
FUJITSU SIEMENS ESPRIMO Mobile U9210.
Patch is relative to -current.
Please check.
Many Thanks Stefan Sperling
for Cod
Hi,
After reading VOP_LOOKUP.9 based on recent commit, a try to remove some dead
code in VFS.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=153886730207657&w=2
VFSLCKDEBUG is not defined anywhere. It is misleading to read in
sys/kern/vfs_vops.c that ASSERT_VP_ISLOCKED(dvp) is being checked, when in
fact,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:41 PM Edgar Pettijohn III
wrote:
> On 10/20/18 6:40 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:34 PM Edgar Pettijohn III <
> ed...@pettijohn-web.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm guessing the if block will never hit since listen returns either 0 or
>> -1.
>>
>
> Uh, but
On 10/20/18 6:40 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:34 PM Edgar Pettijohn III
mailto:ed...@pettijohn-web.com>> wrote:
I'm guessing the if block will never hit since listen returns
either 0 or -1.
Uh, but -1 is true.
Philip
my bad. -1 just feels so untrue.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:34 PM Edgar Pettijohn III
wrote:
> I'm guessing the if block will never hit since listen returns either 0 or
> -1.
>
Uh, but -1 is true.
Philip
I'm guessing the if block will never hit since listen returns either 0
or -1.
Index: cron.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/cron/cron.c,v
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -u -p -u -r1.77 cron.c
--- cron.c 23 Oct 2017 15:15:22 -0
This is OpenBSD tech@
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 08:36:33PM +0100, Andrew Grillet wrote:
> So, substitute opening and closing the connection to the network?
>
> Is the IOMMU not used for disk (and all SCSI) access also?
>
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 at 20:32, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > Andrew Gri
So, substitute opening and closing the connection to the network?
Is the IOMMU not used for disk (and all SCSI) access also?
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 at 20:32, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Andrew Grillet wrote:
>
> > Ok, what I am proposing is that the IOMMU is set up when a file is opened
> > to provi
Andrew Grillet wrote:
> Ok, what I am proposing is that the IOMMU is set up when a file is opened
> to provide the address space required for that file's IO.
Wow, you keep saying file as if it means something.
packets off the network are not associated with any specific "file"
activity
it isn'
Ok, what I am proposing is that the IOMMU is set up when a file is opened
to provide the address space required for that file's IO.
This remains set up until the file is closed, avoiding frequent set-up and
tear-down for each IO transfer.
I assume that there is sufficient IOMMU address space to ha
In this case, what do mbufs have to do with files?
I am very confused.
> I was assuming that the main objection to allocating mbufs for duration of
> file open,
> rather than allocating per transfer, this could result in a much higher
> number of mbufs
> being in use concurrently. I cannot see an
I was assuming that the main objection to allocating mbufs for duration of
file open,
rather than allocating per transfer, this could result in a much higher
number of mbufs
being in use concurrently. I cannot see any other downside (which may be
due to my
not understanding a lot of stuff - I last
* David Gwynne [2018-10-20 12:19:56 +1000]:
Would sending and receiving a VM still work if I/O is run in different
processes?
dlg
Hi dlg,
It will have to be reworked completely but can be done, I think.
--
Pratik
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 05:30:59PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:57:13AM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> > Sync changes to host_*() from ntpd to relayd.
> This looks good, however I'm not a relayd user.
> How did you test it? With both IPv4 and IPv6?
>
I tested both on my
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:57:13AM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Sync changes to host_*() from ntpd to relayd.
This looks good, however I'm not a relayd user.
How did you test it? With both IPv4 and IPv6?
Some nits inline to squash inconsistencies with other `host_ip()' users
in base.
> Index: pa
The java stuff generates sections with names like .rodata.jutf8.10 and
.rodata.jutf.14 that have the entry size (sh_entsize) set to an
integerer that isn't a power of two. When merging these sections into
the final output, lld adjusts the alignment to be at least the entry
size. However, the alig
Andrew Grillet wrote:
> These days we are not so short of memory - would it not be possible to
> allocate an mbuf (or two for double-buffered) for each file
> when opened, and free when closed?
What does this have to do with files??
Sync changes to host_*() from ntpd to relayd.
Index: parse.y
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/relayd/parse.y,v
retrieving revision 1.228
diff -u -p -r1.228 parse.y
--- parse.y 7 Sep 2018 07:35:31 - 1.228
+++ parse.y 2
These days we are not so short of memory - would it not be possible to
allocate an mbuf (or two for double-buffered) for each file
when opened, and free when closed?
I can see the management might be more complex, but the performance
benefits might be considerable.
Also, for VM disk access (ldom o
19 matches
Mail list logo
