Hi all,
It appears that relayd doesn't support TLS client certificate validation
(in the manner that httpd does with "tls client ca [cafile]"). Would
there be interest in a patch that added such support?
Apologies if I've missed something obvious here.
Best,
Ashe
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 06:33:57PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:50:52AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
> > The page refers to vmx0 rather than vxlan0 in its pf.conf
> > guidance.
> >
>
> ... I committed a change to use em0 instead of vmx0.
>
> vmx0 wasn't a good example (I
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:50:52AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
> The page refers to vmx0 rather than vxlan0 in its pf.conf
> guidance.
>
... I committed a change to use em0 instead of vmx0.
vmx0 wasn't a good example (I wrote the manpage around the time when
vmx(4) was new and I used it as a paren
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:50:52AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
> The page refers to vmx0 rather than vxlan0 in its pf.conf
> guidance.
>
Are you sure? In this example, vmx0 is the parent interface that
receives VXLAN UDP packets - it could also be em0, ix0, or whatever
you like.
Reyk
> Index: vx
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 06:53:55PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This is a large diff that changes the way communities are stored in
> filters and filter_sets. Both standard communities and large communities
> now share the same data structure for lookups and at the same time the
> filters are exte
The page refers to vmx0 rather than vxlan0 in its pf.conf
guidance.
Index: vxlan.4
===
RCS file: /systems/cvs/src/share/man/man4/vxlan.4,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 vxlan.4
--- vxlan.4 22 Feb 2018 01:35:04 -
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 05:24:10PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 07:44:01AM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 04:37:49PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:12:46PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > > > the attached diff is another at
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 07:44:01AM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 04:37:49PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:12:46PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > > the attached diff is another attempt at implementing a pvclock(4)
> > > guest driver. This improves t
Since a while announcements added by bgpctl will overwrite the ones from
the config and no longer live next to each other. Because of this step 13
in the decision process is no longer needed.
OK?
--
:wq Claudio
Index: bgpd.8
===
RCS
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 04:37:49PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:12:46PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > the attached diff is another attempt at implementing a pvclock(4)
> > guest driver. This improves the clock on KVM and replaces the need
> > for using the VM-expensive
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:12:46PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> the attached diff is another attempt at implementing a pvclock(4)
> guest driver. This improves the clock on KVM and replaces the need
> for using the VM-expensive acpihpet(4).
>
So far I only got positive reports. Where are the pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
