Re: sysupgrade: no new snapshot -> no error

> On 3 May 2019, at 17:04, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > It is not an error condition if no new snapshot is available. > (Is it?) > > Index: sysupgrade.sh > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/sysupgrade/sysupgrade.sh,v > retriev

[cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com: Re: bgpd acting up, dropping connected/static network statements]

For those people not on misc@. This bgpd diff fixes reload issues with all non fixed (those not using a prefix but e.g. static or rtlabel). On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 09:59:40AM +0200, open...@kene.nu wrote: > Hello, > > I am seeing strange behaviour of bgpd in 6.5. > > Not sure what causes the ne

bgpd TCP MD5 and pfkey shuffle

This diff changes a bit the way tcp md5sum (and ike) is setup. The big change is that the pfkey handling is moved from the session engine to the parent process. In a later step this should allow to no longer distribute autentication data to the unprivileged childs (but this is not done yet since th

Re: [patch] cwm: filter duplicate hostnames in ssh menu

Hello, o...@demirmen.com (Okan Demirmen), 2019.04.29 (Mon) 16:19 (CEST): > On Fri 2019.04.26 at 07:15 +0200, Bruno Fl?ckiger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The ssh menu of cwm(1) doesn't filter duplicated hostnames when reading > > them from ~/.ssh/known_hosts. This patch makes sure each hostname is > >

Re: [PATCH]: Make -P option of mount_mfs(8) support DUIDs

On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 08:05:21PM +0100, Rafael Neves wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 12:35:41AM +0100, Rafael Neves wrote: > > Hi tech@, > > > > When I had to change a HD between machines I figured out that -P option > > of mount_mfs(8) does not work with DUIDs: > > > > # mount_mfs -P ca75525

More randomness for efiboot on amd64

The UEFI standard defines an (optional) protocol for getting random numbers. A while back I wrote support for this for the arm64 bootloader. But we should use this on amd64 as well. I tested that this actually works on a machine with a recent AMD Ryzen APU. Not sure if the firmware implements t

Re: More randomness for efiboot on amd64

Nice. Mike -- does this collide with your current work, or does it not impact it? Mark Kettenis wrote: > The UEFI standard defines an (optional) protocol for getting random > numbers. A while back I wrote support for this for the arm64 > bootloader. But we should use this on amd64 as well. I

Re: More randomness for efiboot on amd64

> From: "Theo de Raadt" > Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 15:03:50 -0600 > > Nice. > > Mike -- does this collide with your current work, or does it > not impact it? This is pretty much completely standalone. The other diff I just mailed out certainly impacts Mike's work. Cheers, Mark > Mark Kettenis

Re: ld.so speedup (part 2)

On 27/04/19(Sat) 21:55, Nathanael Rensen wrote: > The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the dependency > tree is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links over 100 libraries. > > See for example https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=155007285712913&w=2 > > See https://ma

Re: ld.so speedup (part 1)

On 27/04/19(Sat) 21:45, Nathanael Rensen wrote: > The diff below speeds up ld.so library loading where the dependency tree > is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links over 100 libraries. > > See for example https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=155007285712913&w=2 > > The timings below a

Re: More randomness for efiboot on amd64

Mark Kettenis: > The UEFI standard defines an (optional) protocol for getting random > numbers. A while back I wrote support for this for the arm64 > bootloader. But we should use this on amd64 as well. I tested that > this actually works on a machine with a recent AMD Ryzen APU. This also wor