> On 3 May 2019, at 17:04, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> It is not an error condition if no new snapshot is available.
> (Is it?)
>
> Index: sysupgrade.sh
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/sysupgrade/sysupgrade.sh,v
> retriev
For those people not on misc@. This bgpd diff fixes reload issues with
all non fixed (those not using a prefix but e.g. static or rtlabel).
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 09:59:40AM +0200, open...@kene.nu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am seeing strange behaviour of bgpd in 6.5.
>
> Not sure what causes the ne
This diff changes a bit the way tcp md5sum (and ike) is setup.
The big change is that the pfkey handling is moved from the session engine
to the parent process. In a later step this should allow to no longer
distribute autentication data to the unprivileged childs (but this is not
done yet since th
Hello,
o...@demirmen.com (Okan Demirmen), 2019.04.29 (Mon) 16:19 (CEST):
> On Fri 2019.04.26 at 07:15 +0200, Bruno Fl?ckiger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The ssh menu of cwm(1) doesn't filter duplicated hostnames when reading
> > them from ~/.ssh/known_hosts. This patch makes sure each hostname is
> >
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 08:05:21PM +0100, Rafael Neves wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 12:35:41AM +0100, Rafael Neves wrote:
> > Hi tech@,
> >
> > When I had to change a HD between machines I figured out that -P option
> > of mount_mfs(8) does not work with DUIDs:
> >
> > # mount_mfs -P ca75525
The UEFI standard defines an (optional) protocol for getting random
numbers. A while back I wrote support for this for the arm64
bootloader. But we should use this on amd64 as well. I tested that
this actually works on a machine with a recent AMD Ryzen APU. Not
sure if the firmware implements t
Nice.
Mike -- does this collide with your current work, or does it
not impact it?
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The UEFI standard defines an (optional) protocol for getting random
> numbers. A while back I wrote support for this for the arm64
> bootloader. But we should use this on amd64 as well. I
> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 15:03:50 -0600
>
> Nice.
>
> Mike -- does this collide with your current work, or does it
> not impact it?
This is pretty much completely standalone. The other diff I just
mailed out certainly impacts Mike's work.
Cheers,
Mark
> Mark Kettenis
On 27/04/19(Sat) 21:55, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
> The diff below speeds up ld.so library intialisation where the dependency
> tree is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links over 100 libraries.
>
> See for example https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=155007285712913&w=2
>
> See https://ma
On 27/04/19(Sat) 21:45, Nathanael Rensen wrote:
> The diff below speeds up ld.so library loading where the dependency tree
> is broad and deep, such as samba's smbd which links over 100 libraries.
>
> See for example https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=155007285712913&w=2
>
> The timings below a
Mark Kettenis:
> The UEFI standard defines an (optional) protocol for getting random
> numbers. A while back I wrote support for this for the arm64
> bootloader. But we should use this on amd64 as well. I tested that
> this actually works on a machine with a recent AMD Ryzen APU.
This also wor
11 matches
Mail list logo