On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:27:48AM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After updating my router to current, the systems hangs during the boot.
> Maybe its caused by the "invalid EDID"?! The System boots up normaly
> and doesn't hang, if I disable inteldrm(4) in UKC.
>
> Is this issue known?
Hi,
After updating my router to current, the systems hangs during the boot.
Maybe its caused by the "invalid EDID"?! The System boots up normaly
and doesn't hang, if I disable inteldrm(4) in UKC.
Is this issue known? Or, witch additional debug information should I
provide to help fixing this
Hi,
I've got a verbal report that Hyper-V guest services aren't attached
on modern Windows 10 systems so I believe we should get this one-liner
in before 6.6.
FreeBSD revision 349856 adds another define for VMBus 5.0 but AFAICT
it doesn't attempt to use it in version negotiations.
My last 2 updates overwrite Grub2 in a Centos 8/OpenBSD setup. The
update proceed normally and generates no warnings. I recovered the last
time by booting the Centos install disk in rescue mode and running
grub-install. With some direction, I should be able to provide install
logs on my next
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:45:38PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > i think this is probably correct. but i also think that text should be
> > in commas:
> >
> > The segment flag, which defines ..., is specified by segflg.
>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> i think this is probably correct. but i also think that text should be
> in commas:
>
> The segment flag, which defines ..., is specified by segflg.
Fine with me.
> there's another text segment that i suspect should be
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 08:58:19PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> segflg is singular, had to read that sentence thrice to get it right.
>
> OK?
>
>
> Index: man/man9/namei.9
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man9/namei.9,v
>
segflg is singular, had to read that sentence thrice to get it right.
OK?
Index: man/man9/namei.9
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man9/namei.9,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -p -r1.21 namei.9
--- man/man9/namei.913 Aug
The portable version returns -1 in kr_init() because then the fd is
skipped in the poll loop. Now the problem is I changed this some time ago
to exit bgpd. I changed the function to pass the fd a pointer arg and so
the return -1 still works.
Additionally introduce a tcp_md5_unset() function which
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:28:50AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > i got an email recently asking how to configure the tunnel identifier
> > on an eoip(4) interface, and initially wanted to point the sender
> > at the manpage. unfortunately, the manpage is written for
> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:14:14 +0200
> From: Krystian Lewandowski
>
> Mark, thank you for quick feedback.
>
> I'm not pushing or anything of course,
> just want to provide more information.
>
> I put radiator on A64+ I'm using (both were tested with radiator),
> also FreeBSD and OpenBSD may
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 05:42:33PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 06:49:14AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:28:50AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > > i got an email recently asking how to configure the tunnel identifier
> > > on an eoip(4)
David Gwynne(da...@gwynne.id.au) on 2019.09.30 17:42:33 +1000:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 06:49:14AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:28:50AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > > i got an email recently asking how to configure the tunnel identifier
> > > on an eoip(4)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 08:54:14AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:06:34PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > the "public" bpf api no longer supports custom copy functions, so we can
> > remove the plumbing for it internally in the bpf code.
> >
> > ok?
> >
> > Index: bpf.c
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 06:49:14AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:28:50AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > i got an email recently asking how to configure the tunnel identifier
> > on an eoip(4) interface, and initially wanted to point the sender
> > at the manpage.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:06:34PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> the "public" bpf api no longer supports custom copy functions, so we can
> remove the plumbing for it internally in the bpf code.
>
> ok?
>
> Index: bpf.c
> ===
> RCS
16 matches
Mail list logo