On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 01:40:14AM +, Adam Steen wrote:
> Hi
>
> While working on a patch, i noticed that vmm_get_guest_faulttype was
> incorrect for amd (VMM_MODE_RVI) cpus, apon further inspection realised
> it was unused. Please see the patch below to remove it.
>
> cheers
> Adam
>
T
Hi
While working on a patch, i noticed that vmm_get_guest_faulttype was
incorrect for amd (VMM_MODE_RVI) cpus, apon further inspection realised
it was unused. Please see the patch below to remove it.
cheers
Adam
? div
Index: sys/arch/amd64/amd64/vmm.c
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, Marc Espie wrote:
> So, basically, if we start arbitrary commands, then
> the classic loop
> /* Wait for the child to exit. */
> while (waitpid(cpid, &status, 0) == -1 && errno == EINTR)
> continue;
>
> is not quite enough.
>
> See the small note in manpag
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 07:08:26AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > THe ntp protocol uses 32-bit unsigned timestamps counting seconds
> > since 1900. That means that in 2036 the timestamp field will wrap.
> > This diff
On 1/22/20 5:25 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
Karel Gardas wrote:
On 1/21/20 2:33 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
Please test this since I can't test this properly at the moment.
Sorry for delay with testing. Used today current to update and dmesg and
diff of last fix and current dmesg are attached.
yes ok
January 30, 2020 2:02 PM, "Solene Rapenne" wrote:
> on https://opensmtpd.org the OpenBSD version file says 6.6.2 while we
> currently have 6.6.1 in CVS.
>
> Should we bump to 6.6.2?
>
> Index: smtpd.h
> ===
> RCS file: /dat
on https://opensmtpd.org/ the OpenBSD version file says 6.6.2 while we
currently have 6.6.1 in CVS.
Should we bump to 6.6.2?
Index: smtpd.h
===
RCS file: /data/cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.h,v
retrieving revision 1.650
diff -u -p -r1
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:14:37AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Putting this here for discussion... good idea? bad idea? does it need
> more checks for expected file contents?
>
> Index: sysupgrade.sh
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/us
Putting this here for discussion... good idea? bad idea? does it need
more checks for expected file contents?
Index: sysupgrade.sh
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/sysupgrade/sysupgrade.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -p -r1.37 s
So, basically, if we start arbitrary commands, then
the classic loop
/* Wait for the child to exit. */
while (waitpid(cpid, &status, 0) == -1 && errno == EINTR)
continue;
is not quite enough.
See the small note in manpages (not only us, but everyone):
WIFSTOPPED(status
On 21/01/20(Tue) 12:31, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 20/01/20(Mon) 16:42, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below is a refactoring of the actual em(4) code and defines that
> > will allows me to present a shorter diff to interrupt multiple CPUs and
> > make use of multiple queues.
> >
> > It contains
11 matches
Mail list logo