Hello tech list,
This is a diff for base-clang. It would change the powerpc target to
return small structs in registers r3 and r4. This would fix an
incompatibility with gcc in OpenBSD macppc. I fear that if I commit
the diff, I might break snapshot builds. I am looking for help.
I posted
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 09:16:34AM +0100, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> The updated patch below introduces a UMBFLG_NO_INET6 which is set on
> receipt of a MBIM_STATUS_NO_DEVICE_SUPPORT in response to a
> MBIM_CID_CONNECT. The code will then retry the connect operation in
> IPv4-only mode.
>
> That won't
> > When a cpu is idle, and wants to steal, it should steal from worst loaded
> > cpu, i.e. with the highest cost, not the least cost.
>
> What you say might be a valid choice. However I'm not sure to
> understand how does it relate to the behavior of the code?
>
> When stealing
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:04:24PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 02/02/20(Sun) 09:58, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > tty(4) uses custom code for revoking knotes. It should be changed to use
> > klist_invalidate() to handle the revocation in one place. The following
> > diff does that.
>
> Great,
On 04/02/20(Tue) 08:43, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> When a cpu is idle, and wants to steal, it should steal from worst loaded
> cpu, i.e. with the highest cost, not the least cost.
What you say might be a valid choice. However I'm not sure to
understand how does it relate to the behavior of the
Hi,
When a cpu is idle, and wants to steal, it should steal from worst loaded cpu,
i.e. with the highest cost, not the least cost.
Also, remove a dead store while here.
Thanks
Index: kern/kern_sched.c
===
RCS file:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 11:37:12PM +, Laurence Tratt wrote:
> While writing a daemon in Rust, I discovered that, AFAICT, one doesn't have
> sensible access to __progname and has to figure out the executable name
> dynamically (AFAICT), so it ends up in malloc'd storage.
>
You probably should
As recently profiled, the softnet thread which runs mostly without
KERNEL_LOCK() is still somehow serialized with the rest of the kernel.
This is because the various subsystems to notify userland, either via
poll(2)/select(2), kqueue(2) or pgsignal(9) still require this lock.
We worked around
On 02/02/20(Sun) 09:58, Visa Hankala wrote:
> tty(4) uses custom code for revoking knotes. It should be changed to use
> klist_invalidate() to handle the revocation in one place. The following
> diff does that.
Great, your diff is ok mpi@
> In addition, the patch makes the code store the tty
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 08:11:25PM -0500, James Hastings wrote:
> Hello tech@
>
> I would like to add PCI devices for latest Intel SoC (Gemini Lake).
>
> Included a patch for sdhc(4) too that depends on this to enable eMMC.
> The Intel eMMC controller does not like bus power going to 0V. There
>
Hi Alex,
thanks for looking into it.
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 00:20:42 +0100 Alexander Bluhm
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 03:03:47PM +0100, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> > this patch adds IPv6 support to umb(4).
>
> It breaks my IPv4 setup.
>
> umb0 at uhub0 port 4 configuration 1 interface 6
11 matches
Mail list logo
