Re: sdmmc: CIS tuple can have empty body

2020-04-29 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:27:00 +0200 > From: Patrick Wildt > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:16:43PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > on my i.MX8MM EVK there's a ath10k-based WiFi chip which we > > unfortunately do not support (yet?). But the SD/MMC CIS parser > > complains: > > > >

Install: Invalid group _sndiop in #163 amd64

2020-04-29 Thread Oliver Marugg
Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod: During fresh install from install.fs amd64 of OpenBSD 6.7-beta (GENERIC.MP) #163: Tue Apr 28 21:35:13 MDT 2020 ... Making all device nodes...chgrp: group is invalid: _sndiop chgrp: group is invalid: _sndiop done. Multiprocessor machine; using bsd.m

Re: Install: Invalid group _sndiop in #163 amd64

2020-04-29 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:28:37AM +, Oliver Marugg wrote: > Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod: Nope. _sniop is the correct name. The real issue is that that group isn't in the /etc/group file used during install. How that can happen I do not know yet. -Otto > > During f

Re: Install: Invalid group _sndiop in #163 amd64

2020-04-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/04/29 10:28, Oliver Marugg wrote: > Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod: > > During fresh install from install.fs amd64 of OpenBSD 6.7-beta (GENERIC.MP) > #163: Tue Apr 28 21:35:13 MDT 2020 You are showing the version of the installed GENERIC.MP kernel not the install image. I th

Re: Install: Invalid group _sndiop in #163 amd64

2020-04-29 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:02:29PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:28:37AM +, Oliver Marugg wrote: > > > Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod: > > Nope. _sniop is the correct name. The real issue is that that group isn't in > the /etc/group file used during in

Re: Install: Invalid group _sndiop in #163 amd64

2020-04-29 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:26:51PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 01:02:29PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:28:37AM +, Oliver Marugg wrote: > > > > > Possible typo group _sniop shoud be _sndiod: > > > > Nope. _sniop is the correct name. Th

Re: Install: Invalid group _sndiop in #163 amd64

2020-04-29 Thread Oliver Marugg
Yes, I made the mistake using this older snap for install (was on my usb stick) with consequences. With a today downloaded install.fs to USB Stick and http install no problem as you, Otto and Stuart mentioned. thx. Sorry, I really should know using latest -current only, but I learnt not using an

Re: Install: Invalid group _sndiop in #163 amd64

2020-04-29 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:58:55AM +, Oliver Marugg wrote: > Yes, I made the mistake using this older snap for install (was on my usb > stick) with consequences. > With a today downloaded install.fs to USB Stick and http install no problem > as you, Otto and Stuart mentioned. thx. > Sorry, I r

Re: Install: Invalid group _sndiop in #163 amd64

2020-04-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/04/29 11:58, Oliver Marugg wrote: > Yes, I made the mistake using this older snap for install (was on my usb > stick) with consequences. > With a today downloaded install.fs to USB Stick and http install no problem > as you, Otto and Stuart mentioned. thx. > Sorry, I really should know usin

release(8) - mention u-boot-*, dtb, raspberrypi-firmware

2020-04-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
OK to add this? Index: release.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/release.8,v retrieving revision 1.94 diff -u -p -r1.94 release.8 --- release.8 23 Jun 2018 23:19:11 - 1.94 +++ release.8 29 Apr 2020 13:44:19 - @@

Re: [macppc 6.7-beta] clang backend error: "adde Constant" issue

2020-04-29 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:31:12 -0400 > From: George Koehler > > Moving from bugs@ to tech@, > because some people might miss a clang diff on bugs@. > > This diff modifies LLVM's DAGCombiner to skip an optimization if it > would make an illegal ISD::ADDE node. This fixes fatal errors from > p

[PATCH] sysupgrade

2020-04-29 Thread James Jerkins
Hello, This patch adds two new options to sysupgrade. The first option is for small box systems like an APU system that only has the base and manual sets installed. The second option is for headless systems without X11 like servers. I have tested this patch from the 6.5 release to 6.6 release t