When there are unwritten changes to the disklabel, disklabel(8) adds an
'*' to the prompt. Just a minor erratum I noticed doing an install.
diff --git a/faq/faq14.html b/faq/faq14.html
index f53d45180..377f8c7b2 100644
--- a/faq/faq14.html
+++ b/faq/faq14.html
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ sd0> a a
offset:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Mark Kettenis
> >
> > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of
> > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This
> > diff t
There since import from NetBSD, but we have no iommu(4).
OK?
Index: share/man/man4/sbus.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/sbus.4,v
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -p -r1.53 sbus.4
--- share/man/man4/sbus.4 18 Jun 2018 06
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 07:13:33PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:58:02AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
> >
> > Are you ok using patch's -l option for this patch?
>
> Sure, can do. New kernel compiled, will switch my machine tonight. Will
> let you know how things
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:30:52AM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26 2020, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 02:01:06PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >>
> >> For those two reasons I think the feature should be opt-in.
> >
> > Yeah, I agree with you.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:58:02AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
>
> Are you ok using patch's -l option for this patch?
>
Sure, can do. New kernel compiled, will switch my machine tonight. Will
let you know how things go. For meetings I would need couple of days, as
I don't have Google Meet ca
> On Jul 27, 2020, at 11:47 AM, Mikolaj Kucharski
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:24:55AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
>>
>> I have attached an updated patch - which includes Kevin's changes from
>> his earlier email - that also corrects the tx buffer sizes for RTL8153
>> / RTL8153
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:24:55AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
>
> I have attached an updated patch - which includes Kevin's changes from
> his earlier email - that also corrects the tx buffer sizes for RTL8153
> / RTL8153B devices.
>
Unfortunately below diff fails to apply.
2 out of 2 hunk
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:12 PM Mikolaj Kucharski
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 06:47:32PM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote:
> > Mikolaj,
> >
> > Thank you for testing my patch.
> >
> > I am very interested to know what xhci (or ehci) hardware you have.
> >
> > I have the following:
> >
> > xh
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Mark Kettenis
> >
> > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of
> > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This
> > diff t
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:14:21 +0200
> From: Christian Weisgerber
>
> Scott Cheloha:
>
> > --- lib/libc/arch/amd64/gen/usertc.c8 Jul 2020 09:17:48 -
> > 1.2
> > +++ lib/libc/arch/amd64/gen/usertc.c25 Jul 2020 17:50:38 -
> > @@ -21,9 +21,12 @@
> > static inline
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:10:42 -0400
> From: Bryan Steele
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of
> > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This
> > diff tries to supp
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of
> "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This
> diff tries to support machines with firmware that implements this. If
> you see
Scott Cheloha:
> --- lib/libc/arch/amd64/gen/usertc.c 8 Jul 2020 09:17:48 - 1.2
> +++ lib/libc/arch/amd64/gen/usertc.c 25 Jul 2020 17:50:38 -
> @@ -21,9 +21,12 @@
> static inline u_int
> rdtsc(void)
> {
> - uint32_t hi, lo;
> - asm volatile("rdtsc" : "=a"(lo), "=d"(hi));
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of
> "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This
> diff tries to support machines with firmware that implements this. If
> you see something
Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of
"Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This
diff tries to support machines with firmware that implements this. If
you see something like:
"ACPI0007" at acpi0 not configured
please try the following d
16 matches
Mail list logo