Re: [PATCH] Add IOMMU support for Intel VT-d and AMD-Vi

Ok made more changes On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:19:18PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 21:43:39 -0500 > > From: Jordan Hargrave > > > > Made changes for the iommu_readq -> iommu_read_8 and also now > > dynamically allocate the hwdte for AMD IOMMU. > > Some more bits..

Re: PATCH: Add vmmpci device for passthrough PCI

Ping. Any replies or commeents on this? On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:54:49PM -0500, Jordan Hargrave wrote: > This adds a placeholder vmmpci device that will be used for VMD passthrough > PCI. > > Normally the device will fail to attach unless the PCI domain:bus.dev.func has > been registered with

kstat(1): implement wait with setitimer(2)

Hi, Using nanosleep(2) to print the stats periodically causes the period to drift. If you use setitimer(2) it won't drift. ok? Index: kstat.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/kstat/kstat.c,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -p -r1.6 k

ifconfig: consistent display of P2P link

All tunnels & point-to-point addresses are separated by "->" but inet. Denis Index: ifconfig.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c,v retrieving revision 1.426 diff -u -p -r1.426 ifconfig.c --- ifconfig.c 15 Sep 2020 15:2

Re: diff: pfctl: error message for nonexisting rtable

the condition was reversed. ok? Index: parse.y === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/pfctl/parse.y,v retrieving revision 1.702 diff -u -p -r1.702 parse.y --- parse.y 17 Sep 2020 10:09:43 - 1.702 +++ parse.y 17 Sep 2020 14:23:42

[diff] Allow preferred source IP selection

This updated diff unbreak P2P links where local address was not the same as preferred source address. Sending to tech@ may help get more feedback on what I broke. Example usage : Set 2001:db8::1 as source : route source 2001:db8::1 Unset previously set IPv6 address on rdomain 10 : route -T10 sour

Re: diff: pfctl: error message for nonexisting rtable

Hi, I just committed yours. Thanks, On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:07:40 +0200 Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 07:49:19PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: >> New diff is using -1 for ENOENT. >> >> Also domainid == 0 is a valid domain id, but previous diff cannot make >> a cache of it sinc

Re: drop support for afs, nnpfs, and procfs from security(8)

Hi Todd, Todd C. Miller wrote on Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 01:36:09PM -0600: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:17:36 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> Does anyone think that explicitely excluding these file system >> types might still be useful, or is the following simplification >> OK? No functional change inte