On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:08:39PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:07:07AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:42:50PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > mbg(4) is among the few remaining drivers using tsleep(9).
> > >
> > > In a few
* Jozef Hatala [2020-11-29 00:32:17 -0800]:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 12:04:04AM -0800, I wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 06:36:17AM +, Mike wrote:
> And what are you going to return for the other leaf nodes now that
> you are claiming a CPUID level of 0x15, on CPUs that are less than
> that?
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:17:31PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:56:02AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:05:30PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > srp_finalize(9) uses tsleep(9) to spin while it waits for the object's
> > > refc
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:17:31PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:56:02AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:05:30PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > srp_finalize(9) uses tsleep(9) to spin while it waits for the object's
> > > refc
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:03:46AM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/12/20(Fri) 12:01, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 11:41:04AM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Could you try the diff below that only call smr_barrier() for multi-
> > > threaded processes wi
Found some minor issues.
Please disregard for now.
On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 17:12 +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello tech@,
>
> Long story short: the traphandler process in snmpd annoys me a great
> deal and is in the way for overhauling the transport mapping section
> of snmpe, which is needed
