On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 02:00:54PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Given all of this, would it be better if secondary CPUs spin in
> panic(9) instead of trying to print anything?
The panic code should be as primitive as possible. The garbled
output also tells me something. Two CPUs are failing sim
> From: Philip Guenther
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 23:45:46 -0900
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:29 PM Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> On 19/05/21(Wed) 16:17, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > There are the READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() macros. I'm not a big fan
> > of those (since they add clu
ping?
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 04:44:56PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:50:50AM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following diff adds some missing consts for char * to the internal
> > program functions.
> >
> > OK?
> >
> > bye,
> > Jan
> >
> > In
ping?
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 04:44:23PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 04:42:49PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The function lreply() already calls fflush(3) on stdout. So, this calls
> > are useless.
> >
> > OK?
> >
> > bye,
> > Jan
> >
> > Index:
ping?
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 04:45:14PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 11:19:56AM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This cleanup diff, removes a useless if islower(3) from the loop. It is
> > guarantee by toupper(3) that no character will be changed if it
> From: Philip Guenther
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 23:32:17 -0900
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 5:19 AM Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:24:42 +0200
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> ...
>
> > There's only a couple of 'volatile' usages in sys/sys. These
> annotations
> >
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 01:15:28PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 11:06:39 +
> > From: Visa Hankala
> >
> > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 07:08:39PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > In a separate mail thread, bluhm@ mentioned that panic(9) does not
> > > cleanly handle mult
Am Fri, May 21, 2021 at 07:24:59PM +0200 schrieb Mark Kettenis:
> > Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 19:01:39 +0200
> > From: Patrick Wildt
> >
> > Am Fri, May 21, 2021 at 06:18:40PM +0200 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
> > > On 21/05/21(Fri) 10:48, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > > > Am Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:15:50AM
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 19:01:39 +0200
> From: Patrick Wildt
>
> Am Fri, May 21, 2021 at 06:18:40PM +0200 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
> > On 21/05/21(Fri) 10:48, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > > Am Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:15:50AM + schrieb Christian Ludwig:
> > > > The usb(4) driver allows to enumera
Am Fri, May 21, 2021 at 06:18:40PM +0200 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
> On 21/05/21(Fri) 10:48, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > Am Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:15:50AM + schrieb Christian Ludwig:
> > > The usb(4) driver allows to enumerate the bus early during boot by
> > > setting its driver flags to 0x1 in U
On 2021/05/20 08:36, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:05:24AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > When I have time (I'm hopeful for next week but not sure yet) I'll
> > see how this goes with a ports bulk build.
>
> This diff changes usr.sbin/tcpdump/nameser.h rather than
> I don't
On 21/05/21(Fri) 10:48, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Am Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:15:50AM + schrieb Christian Ludwig:
> > The usb(4) driver allows to enumerate the bus early during boot by
> > setting its driver flags to 0x1 in UKC. This mechanism can enable a USB
> > console keyboard early during auto
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 06:03:49AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:19:37AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > My last change to dsdt.c broke one or two of my cheap little Intel
> > "Atom" laptops. Seems my interpretation of the ACPI standard wasn't
> > quite right. I went bac
Am Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:15:50AM + schrieb Christian Ludwig:
> The usb(4) driver allows to enumerate the bus early during boot by
> setting its driver flags to 0x1 in UKC. This mechanism can enable a USB
> console keyboard early during autoconf(9), which can come in handy at
> times. This nee
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:29 PM Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 19/05/21(Wed) 16:17, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
...
> > There are the READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() macros. I'm not a big fan
> > of those (since they add clutter) but they do take care of dependency
> > ordering issues that exist in the a
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 5:19 AM Mark Kettenis
wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:24:42 +0200
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
>
...
> > There's only a couple of 'volatile' usages in sys/sys. These annotations
> > do not explicitly indicate which piece of code requires it. Maybe it
> would
> > be c
16 matches
Mail list logo