Sometimes I see authentication errors from ospfd, mainly (though
possibly not entirely always) on a 30 minute cycle, e.g. these log entries
2021-06-03T05:30:04.952Z ospfd[31748]: spf_calc: area 0.0.0.0 calculated
2021-06-03T05:51:43.785Z ospfd[76044]: auth_validate: decreasing seq num,
Hello David,
>
> my best argument for mutexes in pf is that currently we use smr critical
> sections around things like the bridge and aggr port selection, which
> are very obviously read-only workloads. pf may be a largely read-only
> workload, but where it is at the moment means it's not
Hello David,
> the scope of the pf locks likely needs reduction anyway. one of my
I agree. pf_lock covers too much in PF currently. it protects,
all rules, tables and fragment caches.
> production firewalls panicked with the pf lock trying to lock against
> itself a couple of nights
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:49:24PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:22:33 -0400
> > From: George Koehler
> >
> > On Fri, 7 May 2021 10:31:55 +0200 (CEST)
> > Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> > > Makes sense to me. It seems ldd always seems to require a little bit
> > > more
