Re: Add versioned lib to system perl's @INC for non-packaged modules

Below is the corrected patch for this, but it's not quite ready yet. See the email over on ports@ with some adjustments to perl.port.mk and other patches to fix some ports fallout that sthen@ was super helpful in tracking down. The main issue was that somehow I lost a quote in the patch and so it

Re: time.3: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:01:21 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > NAME > > - get "the" time of day. I don't like having "the" in there. I'd suggest leaving this as it is or simply shortening to either "get time" or "get the time". > SYNOPSIS > > - Not a fan of the "tloc" variable name. Use "now" as

Re: time.3: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 01:01:21PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > Next up, time.3. > > As before, changes by section, with "I don't knows" at the end of the > change list in each section. > hi. comments inline: > NAME > > - get "the" time of day. > > SYNOPSIS > > - Not a fan of the "tloc"

time.3: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

Next up, time.3. As before, changes by section, with "I don't knows" at the end of the change list in each section. NAME - get "the" time of day. SYNOPSIS - Not a fan of the "tloc" variable name. Use "now" as we do in other pages to reinforce the meaning of its contents. DESCRIPTION -

Re: [please test] amd64: schedule clock interrupts against system clock

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 08:12:39AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 06:09:27PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > 1 month bump. I really appreciate the tests I've gotten so far, thank > you. On my Xeon machine it works and all regress tests pass. But it fails on my old Opteron

Re: gettimeofday.2: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

Todd C. Miller wrote: > I really don't like "get or set the UTC time" in the NAME section. > It's not like we have a "get or set the local time" function. > I would prefer if you left the UTC information for the DESCRIPTION. I agree. Excessive obvious detail detracts from simple points.

Re: gettimeofday.2: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:48:27 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > Sure, changed to "get or set the time of day". > > FWIW, the clock_gettime(2) one-liner is "get or set the time". Thanks. > > Instead of saying that settimeofday ignores tz if not NULL why not > > just say that settimeofday ignores tz.

Re: gettimeofday.2: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:01:40AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote: > I really don't like "get or set the UTC time" in the NAME section. > It's not like we have a "get or set the local time" function. > I would prefer if you left the UTC information for the DESCRIPTION. Sure, changed to "get or set

Re: Small nit on one of passwd(1)'s unveil(2)

Actually it does a stat(2) on it, forget about this :) On 16:46 Fri 30 Jul , Ricardo Mestre wrote: > Hi, > > _PATH_MASTERPASSWD_LOCK is opened, from libutil, with O_WRONLY|O_CREAT and > then > unlinked when not necessary anymore so it doesn't need read permissions. > > OK? > > Index:

Re: gettimeofday.2: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

I really don't like "get or set the UTC time" in the NAME section. It's not like we have a "get or set the local time" function. I would prefer if you left the UTC information for the DESCRIPTION. Instead of saying that settimeofday ignores tz if not NULL why not just say that settimeofday

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

Whoops; I thought Theo would make the decision, and his last email made me think he might have. I am happy to help as much as I can to make the process easy for you. In the meantime, I think I will release 5.0.0 when it's ready. I'll take into account your feedback in a future release. Gavin

Small nit on one of passwd(1)'s unveil(2)

Hi, _PATH_MASTERPASSWD_LOCK is opened, from libutil, with O_WRONLY|O_CREAT and then unlinked when not necessary anymore so it doesn't need read permissions. OK? Index: local_passwd.c === RCS file:

Re: gettimeofday.2: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 09:41:38AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > Hi, > > The Description section in this page has always bugged me. The author > chose to save space by merging the description of two different system > calls into a single paragraph. Then the rules and caveats for >

gettimeofday.2: miscellaneous cleanup and rewrites

Hi, The Description section in this page has always bugged me. The author chose to save space by merging the description of two different system calls into a single paragraph. Then the rules and caveats for settimeofday() are off in a separate paragraph. Meh. I recently revised the

Re: clean iwx unused firmware dma allocation

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:26:11PM +0800, zxystd wrote: > It is not a functionality change. The firmware dma is not actually used and > it is due to ported from iwm, this patch remove this allocation. Thanks! I have committed a slightly tweaked version, renaming the final goto label only. I'm

bgpd add add-path receive support

This diff implements the bit to support the receive side of RFC7911 - Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP. I did some basic tests and it works for me. People running route collectors should give this a try. The interaction of Add-Path and bgpctl probably needs some work. Also the MRT dumper

add /etc/dhcpleased.conf to changelist(5)

Watch /etc/dhcpleased.conf. OK? Index: changelist === RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/changelist,v retrieving revision 1.127 diff -u -p -r1.127 changelist --- changelist 13 Sep 2020 10:03:46 - 1.127 +++ changelist 30 Jul 2021

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:31:34PM -0600, Gavin Howard wrote: > Hello, > > At this point, because of the lack of reply, I am going to assume that > my proposal is rejected. While I am sad, I understand. > > Thank you for taking the time to consider my proposal. > > Gavin Howard > I just did