The original poll(2) implementation resumed and returned error POLLNVAL
if the file descriptor was closed by another thread.
This patch adds POLLNVAL translation to ppollcollect(). Currently,
the function returns POLLIN, POLLOUT or something else depending
on the event filter.
OK?
Index: kern/sy
The below diff fixes an issue reported by kn@ on bugs@ [1]. joshe@ also
observed the issue and confirmed the below diff resolves it.
The symptoms were quite odd: errors from fdc(4) during an OpenBSD guest
booting under vmm(4)/vmd(8). We don't emulate a floppy disk drive!!!
I introduced a bug in r
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:10:54AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> The order ipsecstat_inc(); pfkeyv2_expire(); tdb_delete(); looks
> more consistent to me. ok?
OK bluhm@
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 20:19:47 -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> It's not the idiomatic loop from the manpage, but near as I can tell
> it is equivalent.
You are right, I didn't look closely enough.
> ... should we make it idiomatic? Saves a few lines, is less
> confusing, etc.
OK millert@
- todd
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 02:22:41PM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:19:13 -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
>
> > > One advantage to using stdio is that
> > > it will use the optimal I/O blocksize automatically so you could
> > > try using that instead of write(2) and see how it per
> On 21 Nov 2021, at 04:14, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 02:56:58AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> Also I found the `ipsec_notdb' counter description in header doesn't
>> math to netstat(1) description. We never count `ipsec_notdb' and the
>> netstat(1) description lo
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 03:17:08AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Can I propose to commit the diff [1] to expose the TDB hardlimit excess
> statistics and then test this diff? I want to see stable systems with
> non null "TDBs with hard limit excess" couter in the statistics like
> below.
Yes
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 02:56:58AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Also I found the `ipsec_notdb' counter description in header doesn't
> math to netstat(1) description. We never count `ipsec_notdb' and the
> netstat(1) description looks more appropriate so I used it to avoid
> confusion with the
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 07:16:40PM +0100, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
>
> * Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > Updated diff. Re-lock dances were simplified in the unix(4) sockets
> > layer.
>
> I am running this diff and the one before on a Thinkpad T450s which is
> my daily driver (office, c
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 05:31:33PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> New tdb refcounting diff.
>
> I delete and unref the timeouts earlier and fixed some leaks. At
> least on my machine it does not crash and tcp InUse is 0 after
> ipsecctl -F .
>
> Please test.
>
> mvs: Are some of your concerns
When I had playing with bluhm@'s ipsec(4) diffs I found my system
always manages to complete rekeying and I have no TDB's with hardlimit
excess. It seems I'm not the only such person and other testers also
don't have panics Hrvoje Popovski had.
I want to count the TDBs with hardlimit excess as the
Hello! Here's a diff that adds explicit .Tg macros to vi(1), so that
you can jump to vi or ex commands using -Otag or :t. This patch
*should* include every command, but I couldn't figure out how to tag the
'!' and ':!' commands; none of these worked:
.Tg
.Tg !
.Tg !\&
.Tg "!"
This p
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:19:13 -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > One advantage to using stdio is that
> > it will use the optimal I/O blocksize automatically so you could
> > try using that instead of write(2) and see how it performs.
>
> tee(1) needs to write input to N drains, N >= 1. If we use std
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 06:44:58PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2021-11-20 18:41 +01, Florian Obser wrote:
> > On 2021-11-20 18:19 +01, Florian Obser wrote:
> >
> >> +/*
> >> + * Clear AD flag in the answer.
> >> + */
> >> +static void
> >> +clear_ad(struct asr_result *ar)
> >> +{
> >> + st
Hi Vitaliy,
* Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Updated diff. Re-lock dances were simplified in the unix(4) sockets
> layer.
I am running this diff and the one before on a Thinkpad T450s which is
my daily driver (office, coding, web, videos, musik, etc) and noticed no
regressions so far. Suspend/resume
On 2021-11-20 18:41 +01, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2021-11-20 18:19 +01, Florian Obser wrote:
>
>> +/*
>> + * Clear AD flag in the answer.
>> + */
>> +static void
>> +clear_ad(struct asr_result *ar)
>> +{
>> +struct asr_dns_header *h;
>> +uint16_t flags;
>> +
>> +h =
On 2021-11-20 18:19 +01, Florian Obser wrote:
> +/*
> + * Clear AD flag in the answer.
> + */
> +static void
> +clear_ad(struct asr_result *ar)
> +{
> + struct asr_dns_header *h;
> + uint16_t flags;
> +
> + h = (struct asr_dns_header *)ar->ar_data;
> + flags = nt
On 2021-11-20 17:05 +01, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> First, I'm happy to this subject considered again, even if I don't use
> DNSSEC these days I think it makes sense to provide this support in libc.
>
> On Sat, Nov 20 2021, Florian Obser wrote:
>> On 2021-11-20 14:40 +01, Otto Moerbeek wr
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 08:38:27PM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 21:31:12 -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
>
> > Is there a nicer way to pick a "reasonable" buffer size when we just
> > want to move as many bytes as possible on a given platform without
> > hogging the machine?
>
>
New tdb refcounting diff.
I delete and unref the timeouts earlier and fixed some leaks. At
least on my machine it does not crash and tcp InUse is 0 after
ipsecctl -F .
Please test.
mvs: Are some of your concerns resolved by deleting the tdb_reaper() ?
bluhm
Index: net/if_bridge.c
===
Comparing Windows and OpenBSD tcpdumps I noticed some differences:
1) In REMOTE_NDIS_INITIALIZE_MSG (I patched the kernel to send it before
getting MAC address and with proper minor version) bInterfaceClass on
OpenBSD is set to Unknown (0x), on Windows it's properly set to
Wireless Controller
First, I'm happy to this subject considered again, even if I don't use
DNSSEC these days I think it makes sense to provide this support in libc.
On Sat, Nov 20 2021, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2021-11-20 14:40 +01, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 12:20:32PM +0100, Florian Obser
Le 12/11/2021 à 09:11, Anton Lindqvist a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 05:09:35PM -0800, Greg Steuck wrote:
Anton Lindqvist writes:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 03:29:15PM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
Hi,
The second attempt to solve the uhidev claim multiple report ids
conflict didn't work out
On 2021/11/20 10:20, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-11-14 at 22:30 +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > If there is no obvious reason (i.e. be different because you need it for a
> > specific feature) why not to use the same host*() function as other parse.y?
> > it would be better to stay i
On 2021-11-20 14:40 +01, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 12:20:32PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
>> diff --git share/man/man5/resolv.conf.5 share/man/man5/resolv.conf.5
>> index 8d3b91c0832..ac64d3e6fd6 100644
>> --- share/man/man5/resolv.conf.5
>> +++ share/man/man5/resolv.conf.5
>>
Hi Jan,
sorry that i failed to look at this earlier.
Even with your diff, the style is still not completely consistent.
I think that inside .Bd -literal, the best style is exactly the same
as in source code:
structname{
typename;
type*name;
};
where
* can be more than one tab
if some of
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 02:40:59PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 12:20:32PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
>
> > The Authentic Data (AD) flag indicates that the nameserver validated
> > the response using DNSSEC. For clients to trust this the nameserver
> > and the path to th
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 12:20:32PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> The Authentic Data (AD) flag indicates that the nameserver validated
> the response using DNSSEC. For clients to trust this the nameserver
> and the path to the nameserver must be trusted. In the general case
> this is not true.
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, 12 May 2021 19:11:09 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> Radek reported a problem to misc@ that multiple Windows clients behind
> a NAT cannot use a L2TP/IPsec server simultaneously.
>
> https://marc.info/?t=16099681611&r=1&w=2
>
> There is two problems. First is pipex(4) doe
The Authentic Data (AD) flag indicates that the nameserver validated
the response using DNSSEC. For clients to trust this the nameserver
and the path to the nameserver must be trusted. In the general case
this is not true.
We can trust localhost so we set the AD flag on queries to request
validati
On Sun, 2021-11-14 at 22:30 +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> If there is no obvious reason (i.e. be different because you need it for a
> specific feature) why not to use the same host*() function as other parse.y?
> it would be better to stay in sync with otehrr daemons. That way if there is
> an
31 matches
Mail list logo
