On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:08:36PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running forwarding in parallel, I have introduced a hard
> barrier for parallel local protocol processing. The packets are
> requeued from shared to exclusive netlock.
>
> Unless we unlock all protocol input
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:28:46PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:58:16PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > I propose to commit pru_*() hunks first.
>
> OK bluhm@
>
The pr_usrreqs hunks. I replaced spaces by tab within `routesw'
structure.
> These are two
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:58:16PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> I propose to commit pru_*() hunks first.
OK bluhm@
> Index: sys/kern/sys_socket.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/sys_socket.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.51
>
Hi,
While running forwarding in parallel, I have introduced a hard
barrier for parallel local protocol processing. The packets are
requeued from shared to exclusive netlock.
Unless we unlock all protocol input routines at once, we need some
mechanism from to move from one queue to the other.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 12:04:57PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 03:48:57PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > We use if (error != 0) or if (m == NULL) idioms in the network stack, so
> > I used them too in the trivial places.
>
> I nearly got them consistent in
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 01:06:38AM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The below changeset extends rpki-client(8) to validate and emit
> Autonomous System Provider Authorizations (ASPAs) in JSON format for
> consumption in other routing stacks.
>
> The ASPA CMS protected content type is
Because there is a hope someone will fix it.
Solène Rapenne wrote:
> hi
>
> is there a reason to keep mount_tmpfs available while it's deactived in
> the kernel?
>
> Index: sbin/Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/Makefile,v
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 09:59:11PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 06:16:30PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:10:19PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > An errata exists for RFC 6482, which informs us: """The EE certificate
> > >
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 10:16:43AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This diff changes tcpbench to use the TCP_INFO getsockopt to fetch
> all the extra information instead of kvm.
> The variable names change because of this.
OK bluhm@
> - if (pledge("stdio unveil rpath dns inet unix id proc",
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 03:48:57PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> We use if (error != 0) or if (m == NULL) idioms in the network stack, so
> I used them too in the trivial places.
I nearly got them consistent in netinet/netinet6
$ grep 'if (error)' netinet*/* | wc
106 347
This diff changes tcpbench to use the TCP_INFO getsockopt to fetch
all the extra information instead of kvm.
The variable names change because of this.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file:
11 matches
Mail list logo