Re: /dev/full

2023-03-03 Thread bug
You clearly do. You're replying to it, and seem to have strong feelings on the matter. On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 07:18:41PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Does anyone give a shit, besides you?

Re: /dev/full

2023-03-03 Thread Crystal Kolipe
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 07:18:41PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > What is with the long mail? Theo: Daniel Dickman asked a question to me, on-list. I provided the answer, and tried to close the issue once and for all to avoid further replies. You replied to the thread. List: The truth is that

Re: /dev/full

2023-03-03 Thread Janne Johansson
Den fre 3 mars 2023 kl 10:15 skrev Crystal Kolipe : > The intended use of full is for testing how simple shell scripts behave when > they hit an unwritable file. > > > It should simply skip doing the round-trip through kernel. > > This comment is pure bullshit. Applicable to the python case and ba

Re: /dev/full

2023-03-03 Thread Crystal Kolipe
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 10:31:58AM +0100, Janne Johansson wrote: > Of course it is ridiculous when you can just make a small mfs and fill it up. As a non-root user?

Re: pf(4) drops valid IGMP/MLD messages

2023-03-03 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 08:54:51AM +0100, Luca Di Gregorio wrote: > Hi, just another bit of info about this issue. Instead of implementing more and more details of RFC, we should discuss what the goal is. We had a pf that dropped valid IGMP packets due to router-alert option. So I added code to

Re: pf(4) drops valid IGMP/MLD messages

2023-03-03 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
Hello, On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 09:14:38PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 08:54:51AM +0100, Luca Di Gregorio wrote: > > Hi, just another bit of info about this issue. > > Instead of implementing more and more details of RFC, we should > discuss what the goal is. > > We had

Re: /dev/full

2023-03-03 Thread David Arnold
On 3 Mar 2023, at 03:14, Crystal Kolipe wrote:On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 09:06:17AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: What next? /dev/multiply -- you write two 32-bit values and then you can read a new 32 bit value? Actually, that sounds quite cool :-). https://9front.org needs you

Re: pf(4) drops valid IGMP/MLD messages

2023-03-03 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 12:09:41AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > 6847 /* IGMP packets have router alert options, allow them */ > 6848 if (pd->proto == IPPROTO_IGMP) { > 6849 /* > 6850 * According to RFC 1112 ttl must be set to 1 in all IGMP > 6

Re: pf(4) drops valid IGMP/MLD messages

2023-03-03 Thread Luca Di Gregorio
Hi, my modest opinions: > Instead of implementing more and more details of RFC, we should > discuss what the goal is. I'd like to have multicast routing working properly. Multicast routing with good network architecture allows people to save tons of resources on hosts, as well as saving a lot of