Re: VisionFive 2

2023-08-01 Thread Peter J. Philipp
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:11:43PM +0200, Robert Palm wrote: > I own a VF 2 version 1.2a and can successfully install / boot the machine. > > The inner network port (dwqe1) works at 100 full duplex and receives ipv4 > via DHCP. > > The outer port currently doesn't seem to get an ip, but gets acti

VisionFive 2

2023-08-01 Thread Robert Palm
I own a VF 2 version 1.2a and can successfully install / boot the machine. The inner network port (dwqe1) works at 100 full duplex and receives ipv4 via DHCP. The outer port currently doesn't seem to get an ip, but gets active and in full-duplex 100. It seems a lot depends on proper .dtb

Patch: support for Dell HBA350i

2023-08-01 Thread mathieu . papineau
Hello, We have some Dell PowerEdge R350 equipped with Dell HBA350i (RAID) but this hardware isn't recognized by OpenBSD 7.3. There seems to be 8 product identifiers associated to the chip involved (SAS3816). So I've added all of them to the list, accordingly to the diff file attached to this emai

Re: axppmic(4): axp313a support

2023-08-01 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 22:34:05 +0900 > From: SASANO Takayoshi > > hi, > > > maybe add a note that the data sheet is wrong for dcdc3? > > The datasheet issue is written in Linux code at > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc4/source/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c#L725 > > > /* > >

Re: axppmic(4): axp313a support

2023-08-01 Thread SASANO Takayoshi
hi, > maybe add a note that the data sheet is wrong for dcdc3? The datasheet issue is written in Linux code at https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc4/source/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c#L725 > /* > * This is deviating from the datasheet. The values here are taken from the > * BSP dr

Re: pf(4) may cause relayd(8) to abort

2023-08-01 Thread Kapetanakis Giannis
Just for the record, I'm running that pf_table patch for almost a month now without any negative impact on my load balancers. pfsync/carp/relayd It also solved my problem with relayd. However I believe some care should also be taken on relayd part - do not check statistics on disabled redirects

Re: uvm_meter remove wakeup of swapper

2023-08-01 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:24:01AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > Now that the issue in inteldrm was resolved we can finally remove this > old wakeup of the swapper. > > OK? ok mvs > -- > :wq Claudio > > Index: uvm_meter.c > === >

uvm_meter remove wakeup of swapper

2023-08-01 Thread Claudio Jeker
Now that the issue in inteldrm was resolved we can finally remove this old wakeup of the swapper. OK? -- :wq Claudio Index: uvm_meter.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_meter.c,v retrieving revision 1.44 diff -u -p -r1.44 uvm_mete

Re: uvm_meter: remove wakeup of proc0

2023-08-01 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 08:31:41PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:04:44PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 09:49:30PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 08:03:41PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > > > > This is the culprit: >