On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 09:17:05PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
[...]
> I think maybe I'd prefer to have some variable that could be used
> *instead* of the existing GH_* variables rather than in conjunction with
> them (so they can be used for all GH archive ports, rather than have
> them a
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 12:41:18AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> I think it's better to merge SO_BINDANY cases from both switch blocks.
> This time SO_LINGER case is separated, so there is no reason for
> dedicated switch block.
OK bluhm@
> Index: sys/kern/uipc_socket.c
>
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:40:46PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 12:38:23AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > @@ -1856,6 +1856,9 @@ sosetopt(struct socket *so, int level, i
> > case SO_SNDLOWAT:
> > case SO_RCVLOWAT:
> > {
> > +
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 12:38:23AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> @@ -1856,6 +1856,9 @@ sosetopt(struct socket *so, int level, i
> case SO_SNDLOWAT:
> case SO_RCVLOWAT:
> {
> + struct sockbuf *sb = (optname == SO_SNDBUF ||
> +
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 01:50:52AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> OK to commit?
OK bluhm@
> 8<---8<---8<--8<
> diff --git a/sys/net/pf_table.c b/sys/net/pf_table.c
> index 6f23a6f795d..c862c804f84 100644
> --- a/sys/net/pf_table.c
>
> From: Dale Rahn
> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 12:36:45 -0400
>
> Switching the computation of cycles/delaycnt to a proper 64 value math
> instead of the '32 bit safe' complex math is likely a good idea.
> However I am not completely convinced that switching to 'yield' (current
> CPU_BUSY_CYCLE
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:40:06AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 01:33:05AM -0400, A Tammy wrote:
> >
> > On 8/5/23 00:49, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 12:17:48AM -0400, aisha wrote:
> > >> On 22/09/10 01:53PM, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, Aug
Switching the computation of cycles/delaycnt to a proper 64 value math
instead of the '32 bit safe' complex math is likely a good idea.
However I am not completely convinced that switching to 'yield' (current
CPU_BUSY_CYCLE implementation) for every loop of a 'short wait' in the wait
loop makes
On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 01:33:05AM -0400, A Tammy wrote:
>
> On 8/5/23 00:49, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 12:17:48AM -0400, aisha wrote:
> >> On 22/09/10 01:53PM, Visa Hankala wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 04:48:37PM -0400, aisha wrote:
> I've added a patch which
Actually, as far as bsd.port.mk, it doesn't need to
move too much stuff around thanks to make's lazyness.
Note that having a list of defined MASTER_SITES variables simplifies
the check.
I've also added a check for the right MASTER_SITES to be defined,
since currently we do not error out until
Here's a revised diff (reordered plus actual use of the boolean)
plus concrete example use for bsd.port.mk (disregarding the fact
_ALL_VARIABLES would have to move *after* all MASTER_SITES have been defined.
Index: var.c
===
RCS
11 matches
Mail list logo
