Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Does the tiny kexec kernel actually need network, bio(4) or HID devices?
I think you are playing with fire when you remove potential console devices.
Does the tiny kexec kernel actually need network, bio(4) or HID devices?
octeon/BOOT does not have any of this.
Looks like too much of powerpc64/RAMDISK remained, but I might be missing
some obvious difference between these platforms.
The Raptor CS Blackbird used for the re-upgrade prevention
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 02:12:21PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 02:03:08PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > Also use this mutex to protect `evqueue_head', `evqueue_tail' and
> > `evqueue_count'.
> >
>
> Sorry, the right diff:
OK bluhm@
> Index: sys/dev/hotplug.c
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:40:28AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Context switch looks fine here.
OK bluhm@
> Index: sys/dev/pv/hypervic.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pv/hypervic.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.19
> diff -u -p
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 01:05:17PM -0500, Brian Conway wrote:
> Greetings. I noticed the above behavior with the latest 7.4-beta when
> scripting some fw_update runs. Perhaps a corner case was missed in the
> recent work? Steps below, let me know if more information is required
> to reproduce.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 01:12:22PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> `log_mtx' mutex(9) already used for message buffer protection, so use it
> to protect `logread_filtops' too.
>
> ok?
OK bluhm@
> Index: sys/kern/subr_log.c
> ===
Greetings. I noticed the above behavior with the latest 7.4-beta when scripting
some fw_update runs. Perhaps a corner case was missed in the recent work? Steps
below, let me know if more information is required to reproduce. Thanks in
advance.
root:current-amd64.124:0:~# fw_update -d intel;
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:21:42PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> A leak may happens when wgpeer is deleted.
>
> ok?
OK bluhm@
> The state queue should be freeed when wg_peer is destroyed.
> diff from IIJ.
>
> Index: sys/net/if_wg.c
>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 10:30:01PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> In comparison to MI boot which only cares about /bsd.upgrade's x bit,
> powerpc64 rdboot just wants a regular file.
>
> Require and strip u+x before execution to prevent sysupgrade(8) loop.
> I'm new to powerpc64 and can't think of
Index: ssh.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1,v
retrieving revision 1.437
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.437 ssh.1
--- ssh.1 23 Jul 2023 20:04:45 - 1.437
+++ ssh.1 22 Sep 2023 11:21:35 -
@@ -108,12 +108,12 @@
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:21:42PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> A leak may happens when wgpeer is deleted.
>
> ok?
>
ok mvs@
> The state queue should be freeed when wg_peer is destroyed.
> diff from IIJ.
>
> Index: sys/net/if_wg.c
>
11 matches
Mail list logo