Op Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:15:42 +0200 schreef Boudewijn Dijkstra
:
Both asr_private.h and asr_utils.c have mname before rname but not
asr_debug.c.
And another thing while we're here: since 2019 the flag RES_USE_CD exists,
but this was never added to asr_debug.c. New patch follows.
Both asr_private.h and asr_utils.c have mname before rname but not
asr_debug.c.
Index: asr_debug.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/asr/asr_debug.c,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -p -r1.26 asr_debug.c
--- asr_debug.c 3 Jul 2019
#x27;t check spamd blacklists in main process if the
address is in the local traplist. If the address is in another blacklist,
it will pick that up in the next loop.
3. In spamd(8), let sdl_check() disregard tag "spamd-greytrap".
4. ???
Which is preferred?
--
Boudewijn Dijkstra
Indes-IDS B.V.
+31 345 545 535
According to dbopen(3), the 'type' field of struct DB holds the "type of
the underlying access method (and file format)." In __bt_open() it is set
to DB_BTREE and in __hash_open() it is set to DB_HASH, so one might expect
that in __rec_open() it is set to DB_RECNO. However, it is left untou
Anyone?
Op Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:22:07 +0100 schreef Boudewijn Dijkstra
:
Some upd(4) devices use -1 for "On" and some use 1. sysctl(8) and
sensorsd(8) hide this detail from the user, which makes it difficult to
define low and high values in sensorsd.conf(5).
Also see https://ma
sensor.status = SENSOR_S_OK;
sensor->ksensor.flags &= ~SENSOR_FINVALID;
Note that this will break some configurations.
--
Boudewijn Dijkstra
Indes-IDS B.V.
+31 345 545 535
Op Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:51:12 +0100 schreef Mark Kettenis
:
I hate to loose yet another strict-alignment canary, but the reality
is that the rest of the world assumes that armv7 supports unaligned
access which means that compilers generate code that assumes this
works when compiling code for armv
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:08:07 +0200 schreef Otto Moerbeek :
/usr/src/usr.sbin/sasyncd/carp.c:157:12: warning: comparison of
unsigned enum expression < 0 is always false [-Wtautological-compare]
if (state < 0 || state > FAIL)
~ ^ ~
/usr/src/usr.sbin/sasyncd/carp.c:166:20: wa
Op Fri, 19 May 2017 15:17:55 +0200 schreef Anton Lindqvist
:
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:33:33AM -0300, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
On 19/05/17 03:42, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
>
> +static int
> +u8len(unsigned char c)
> +{
> + switch (c & 0xF0) {
> + case 0xF0:
> + return 4;
> + case 0
Op Sat, 07 Mar 2015 20:13:45 +0100 schreef David Coppa :
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
Or you could start with the linked Ubuntu advisory and try to discover where
they hide the relevant patches. Heaven forbid they directly link to them,
somebody might discover Ubuntu is b
Op Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:12:07 +0100 schreef Ted Unangst :
Freetype (http://www.freetype.org/) 2.5.5 was released a little while ago,
fixing some security vulnerabilities. Actually as I understand it, 2.5.4
fixed the vulns, then 2.5.5 fixed the fix.
OpenBSD 5.7 will ship with 2.5.5; 5.6 shipped wi
Until we start to worry about Y2K1, does it really matter what the
NVRAM_CENTURY byte says?
--- /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/isa/clock.c.orig Mon May 6 02:15:11 2013
+++ /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/isa/clock.c Wed Aug 27 19:02:46 2014
@@ -502,85 +502,6 @@
static int timeset;
/*
- * check whethe
Op Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:51:32 +0200 schreef Miod Vallat :
Because if we were to apply this diff, there would be no way to switch
from rw+softdep to rw.
That was already broken; rw->rw is not affected as per the enclosing
if-block.
Which is why the current way to remove softdep from a filesy
Op Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:50:34 +0200 schreef Miod Vallat :
Why not keep the softdep flag when updating rw->ro?
E.g. via mount -ur /usr/obj
fstab(5) already allows ro+softdep.
Because if we were to apply this diff, there would be no way to switch
from rw+softdep to rw.
That was already broken; r
Why not keep the softdep flag when updating rw->ro?
E.g. via mount -ur /usr/obj
fstab(5) already allows ro+softdep.
--- /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c.orig Wed Aug 27 19:00:31 2014
+++ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c Wed Aug 27 19:01:19 2014
@@ -218,10 +218,9 @@
Op Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:02:38 +0100 schreef Han Boetes
:
Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
Op Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:54:37 +0100 schreef Han Boetes
:
> At the moment all spamd greylisting cares about is, "does it retry
> connecting?" Unfortunately a lot of spammers do a spamrun and
> s
Op Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:54:37 +0100 schreef Han Boetes
:
At the moment all spamd greylisting cares about is, "does it retry
connecting?" Unfortunately a lot of spammers do a spamrun and
simply try sending a spam message or 10 and then move on to the
next smtp server on their list and that get's t
Op Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:55:32 +0100 schreef Ingo Schwarze
:
Anthony J. Bentley wrote on Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 01:37:50PM -0600:
$ mandoc -Tlint /usr/src/share/man/man4/udl.4
/usr/src/share/man/man4/udl.4:42:6:
ERROR: skipping bad character: ignoring byte
Thanks for reporting!
Indeed, that cha
18 matches
Mail list logo