Re: document USE_NOBTCFI in bsd.port.mk

2023-09-08 Thread Lucas Raab
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 03:22:32PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Lucas Raab writes: > > +writes a wrapper script to ${WRKDIR}/bin/ld in > > Use: > > .Pa ${WRKDIR}/bin/ld > > I see it's wrong elsewhere in the manpage, but let's not introduce another. >

Re: document USE_NOBTCFI in bsd.port.mk

2023-09-08 Thread Lucas Raab
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 02:49:56PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Lucas Raab writes: > > +Use when a port requires no enforcement of indirect branch targets. Use > > New sentence, new line. > > > +.Ev USE_NOBTCFI-${MACHINE_ARCH} > > +to apply to specifi

document USE_NOBTCFI in bsd.port.mk

2023-09-08 Thread Lucas Raab
Hello, Following up on a suggestion from tb@, here's a proposed addition to bsd.port.mk to document the use of USE_NOBTCFI[-${MACHINE_ARCH}]. Text and formatting mostly borrowed from the other USE_ sections so feedback welcome on improvements (particularly placement of the ${MACHINE_ARCH}, I

Re: M1 Macmini lost hw.cpuspeed

2022-10-25 Thread Lucas Raab
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 04:37:14PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 04:15:40PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:52:00 +0200 > > > From: Robert Nagy > > > > > > On 24/10/22 14:49 +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at

Re: hidmt: clickpad detection

2022-09-18 Thread Lucas Raab
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:06:33PM +0200, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > The diff below improves the way hidmt identifies clickpads, and > addresses the problems described in > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=165296530618617=2 > and > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=165980534415586=2 > > If

Re: [PATCH} efifb support for wsmoused + smaller fonts

2020-05-25 Thread Lucas Raab
/25 14:17:58; author: fcambus; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3; > commitid: hL9P1vyWGBp5FHhE; > Revert back to using previous values for EFIFB_WIDTH and EFIFB_HEIGHT, > as raising them expose an issue which breaks inteldrm on large screen > resolutions. > > Reported by chris@, an

Re: [PLEASE TEST] acpi(4): acpi_sleep(): tsleep(9) -> tsleep_nsec(9)

2020-03-17 Thread Lucas Raab
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020, at 21:55, Scott Cheloha wrote: > Hi, > > This is a straightforward ticks-to-milliseconds conversion, but IIRC > pirofti@ wanted me to get some tests before committing it. > > The only users of acpi_sleep() are (a) acpitz(4) and (b) any AML code > that uses AMLOP_SLEEP.