On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 19:30 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
This moves the accounting flag to struct process where it belongs.
The main rationale is that accounting flags are being collected on
the program exit. Ok?
don't set AFORK when forking threads pointed out by guenther;
missed suser
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 22:40 +0900, SASANO Takayoshi wrote:
Hello,
I have a system with an asrock a75m-itx motherboard and an amd a6-3500
processor. I notice there is a 40 second delay after the 'ahci0 at pci0
dev 17
...' line.
I have IBM's ThinkPad Edge E525, AMD A8-3500M
guenther@ has pointed out that sometimes suser is passed an incorrect
flags argument. Currently, there's only one flag that's defined:
SUSER_NOACCT (0x1). Unfortunately it aligns too well with AFORK flag
used with p_acflag. This diff cleans up the tree. OK?
Index: dev/pci/if_san_obsd.c
This moves the accounting flag to struct process where it belongs.
The main rationale is that accounting flags are being collected on
the program exit. Ok?
Index: kern/kern_acct.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/kern_acct.c,v
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Alexander Polakov polac...@gmail.com wrote:
* Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru [120404 17:51]:
i agree that this is a great find. i don't really like the diff though.
i see no point in introducing this macro. what do others think?
Your diff looks better to me
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 14:42 +0400, Alexander Polakov wrote:
This is a diff from NetBSD pr.34583:
http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=34583
Quoting the author:
I noticed that when writing large file (hundreds of megabytes)
to an msdos disk, the writing
According to the RFC 2460 and RFC 5095, ICMP Parameter Problem, Code 0
should be sent, not Code 2. OK?
(while at the spot, kill a trailing whitespace)
diff --git sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c
index 6afde60..e554ad7 100644
--- sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c
+++
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 13:15 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
According to the RFC 2460 and RFC 5095, ICMP Parameter Problem, Code 0
should be sent, not Code 2. OK?
(while at the spot, kill a trailing whitespace)
we have improved the diff with sperreault@ to set a pointer field as
well
no need to do route lookup and perform other expensive checks
if redirect destination is not unicast. this just moves this
check a bit up. ok?
diff --git sys/netinet6/icmp6.c sys/netinet6/icmp6.c
index 1501766..40361f4 100644
--- sys/netinet6/icmp6.c
+++ sys/netinet6/icmp6.c
@@ -2212,6 +2212,13
So when TLLA/SLLA is not specified we get into a weird state where
we don't know a LL address and don't ask for it. Apparently, this
is not what some IPv6 compliance tests expect. For example Tahi
really wants you to ask for a LLA by sending a neighbor solicitation
which means state should be
RFC 4861 says:
Target link-layer address
The link-layer address for the target, i.e., the
sender of the advertisement. This option MUST be
included on link layers that have addresses when
responding to
When route priorities were added to the RA/redirects code, all
of them got set to RTP_CONNECTED. Most importantly, rt6_flush
was made to flush only RTP_CONNECTED routes. The purpose of
rt6_flush is to flush *all* routes going via a specified gw.
Now the problem is that the code in
we had this discussion recently and the outcome is: show the *actual* diff
that was close to getting committed. so far there hasn't been any.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Mitja MuEeniD
mi...@muzenic.net wrote:
Hey,
there was a longish thread here roughly 4 years ago titled [patch] pf
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 19:34 +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:16:42 +0100
Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:32:08PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
In ip_input(), there is a filter to disable all packets to 127.0.0.0/27.
That
to pinpoint the exact packet sizes. I
haven't tested with MD5 yet.
With the diff, previously sent off-list by Mike, there was no verification
errors(with SHA1+AES and SHA1+3DES) in 24 hours.
Thanks,
Joosep
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
ubsec gets
this allows us to bridge two ipv4 networks over an ipv6 link with gif.
any objections? oks? the change was well tested by phessler.
diff --git netinet6/in6_proto.c netinet6/in6_proto.c
index 7575055..8cf3de4 100644
--- netinet6/in6_proto.c
+++ netinet6/in6_proto.c
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@
ubsec gets stuck after receiving a packet of a particular
length. for example, in my tests it was a tcp packet with
59 bytes of payload. interestingly, something breaks horribly
in the hardware and it stops processing any other packets.
the exact cause is believed to be a difference between the
ftp-proxy has all the code to support on rdomain feature
in place, just not used. the change below uses an rdomain
obtained via the SO_RTABLE socket option of the accepted
socket. OK?
Index: filter.c
===
RCS file:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 17:00 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 15:46 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
hi,
here's a diff that adds support for the SMBus controller found
on AMD CS5536:
glxpcib0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 AMD CS5536 ISA rev 0x03: rev 3, 32-bit
This is a well-known from thib and dlg originally with a length fix
from yours truly, that marginally doubles througput (from 300kpps to
500-600kpps on selected hardware).
The idea is to save an IP header and 8 bytes of payload (good enough
for tcp state tracking) instead of recommended 68 bytes.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 15:46 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
hi,
here's a diff that adds support for the SMBus controller found
on AMD CS5536:
glxpcib0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 AMD CS5536 ISA rev 0x03: rev 3, 32-bit
3579545Hz timer, watchdog, gpio, i2c
gpio0 at glxpcib0: 32 pins
iic0
hi,
here's a diff that adds support for the SMBus controller found
on AMD CS5536:
glxpcib0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 AMD CS5536 ISA rev 0x03: rev 3, 32-bit
3579545Hz timer, watchdog, gpio, i2c
gpio0 at glxpcib0: 32 pins
iic0 at glxpcib0
maxtmp0 at iic0 addr 0x4c: lm86
# sysctl hw.sensors
Hi,
As it became evident, ix is driven by Low Latency Interrupts
on 82599 to do all sorts of processing instead of the regular
Rx/Tx queue interrupts. LLI is an additional facility that
is aimed to do out of band signalling for certain conditions.
Therefore it has it's own interrupt moderation
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 17:12 +, Miod Vallat wrote:
Machine needs an update anyway, but does anyone know offhand what
this might be?
Dereference of a NULL (or invalid) function pointer, coupled with the
lack of smarts of the ddb code. (part of my ddb todolist somewhere)
Miod
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
Any comments? (bleurgh is implicitly assumed).
OK? This mail was sent through a router running it.
hi,
if you remove pp_fastq, why don't i see it being removed from the header
file?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Christian Ehrhardt
christian_ehrha...@genua.de wrote:
Hi!
the ix(4)-Driver stores a pointer to the pci_attach_args structure (as
passed to ixgbe_attach) in its softc. However, the pci_attach_args
structure lives on the stack somewhere in autoconf, i.e. its
Hi,
If there's no objections, I'm going to commit it soon.
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 15:30 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
hi,
hardware vlan tagging/stripping got broken with the driver update.
freebsd people have changed the code to handle events from the vlan(4)
pseudo-device
hi,
hardware vlan tagging/stripping got broken with the driver update.
freebsd people have changed the code to handle events from the vlan(4)
pseudo-device into the hardware driver. so when you configure new
vlan a special function is called and driver can setup a vlan filtering
table. because
got an ok from henning, anyone else cares to comment?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 00:40 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
updating regress tests, i've noticed that some of the optimizer
tests are failing with additional (unoptimized) rules popping out.
digging deeper has shown that is indeed a bug
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 18:50 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message -
| Hi All,
|
| Today is our semester maintenance day and we've upgraded our backup
| bridge firewall to the Dec. 15, 2011 snapshot available from
| ftp.openbsd.org and I'm getting this odd error when I
i've decided to rewrite the description to faciliate the review
process.
currently icmp6-icmp translation fails because of the incorrect
icmp direction check in pf_icmp_state_lookup. first of all it
checks all icmp packets except for the echo reply. the reasons
for this are unknown. it works
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 21:46 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 18:50 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
- Original Message -
| Hi All,
|
| Today is our semester maintenance day and we've upgraded our backup
| bridge firewall to the Dec. 15, 2011 snapshot
this is an improved diff that addresses the problem with forced
unmount of the ntfs filesystem in situations like the one described
here: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugsm=132257956328474w=2
ntfs keeps a bunch of vnodes opened and marked as VSYSTEM including
the mount point: it's usecount is 1
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
logana...@devio.us wrote:
command is initialised in main but not freed
before exit.
because there's no reason to do it. when program terminates
all resources are returned to the operating system.
updating regress tests, i've noticed that some of the optimizer
tests are failing with additional (unoptimized) rules popping out.
digging deeper has shown that is indeed a bug introduced by af-to
(sorry!). the fix is simple though.
ok?
Index: parse.y
pfctl should not infer the af-to behavior from the af/naf
difference. instead, we should be clear that this is an
af-to rule. essentially this diff converts FOM_AFTO marker
into a rule flag PFRULE_AFTO so that we don't rely on
ambiguous checks (like r-af != r-naf) when setting things up.
also,
still looking for ok's for this version of the diff.
although i've got mcbride's and claudio's oks for the
older version, this is the one i consider correct.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
hi,
icmp6-icmp translation does't work because of the strange
there are some m_freem's missing in the error code paths.
i guess that's because freebsd code is a bit different
and we didn't look closely at it.
ok?
diff --git dev/pci/if_ix.c dev/pci/if_ix.c
index 4468401..8ab83f8 100644
--- dev/pci/if_ix.c
+++ dev/pci/if_ix.c
@@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@
we need to always schedule another rx ring refill callout
in case we fail to do it at the spot. previously what would
happen is that say we have 2 clusters on the rx ring and we
schedule an rxrefill callout that fails to update the ring.
then we still have those 2 clusters around. under heavy
we don't do intel i/oat and don't set up parameters for the
tcp timer interrupts, therefore there's no reason we should
enable the interrupt itself.
ok?
diff --git dev/pci/ixgbe_type.h dev/pci/ixgbe_type.h
index 601c6d5..b59 100644
--- dev/pci/ixgbe_type.h
+++ dev/pci/ixgbe_type.h
@@
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 15:02 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
hi,
i've spent a week trying to fix performance regression in ix(4)
since the introduction of the new driver and this is where i'm
right now. with the following change machine is able to sustain
760kpps and reach 9Gbit/s
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 17:46 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
there are some m_freem's missing in the error code paths.
i guess that's because freebsd code is a bit different
and we didn't look closely at it.
ok?
@@ -2601,6 +2604,8 @@ no_split:
error = bus_dmamap_load_mbuf(rxr
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Claudio Jeker clau...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:43:38PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
shaves off some bus read/write operations.
tested on 82598 and 82599. ok?
On what information is this based? The intel driver in .Fx does not do
shaves off some bus read/write operations.
tested on 82598 and 82599. ok?
diff --git a/dev/pci/if_ix.c b/dev/pci/if_ix.c
index 2c0d8e0..e3b575f 100644
--- a/dev/pci/if_ix.c
+++ b/dev/pci/if_ix.c
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ ixgbe_legacy_irq(void *arg)
struct tx_ring *txr = sc-tx_rings;
lost while upgrading the driver. originally from claudio in rev1.46.
tested on 82599 w/ sfp+. ok?
diff --git a/dev/pci/if_ix.c b/dev/pci/if_ix.c
index e3b575f..cec0c99 100644
--- a/dev/pci/if_ix.c
+++ b/dev/pci/if_ix.c
@@ -635,8 +635,7 @@ ixgbe_init(void *arg)
struct ifnet*ifp =
checksum fix from reyk (rev1.31) was lost during update:
Fix the IP ckecksum offloading logic that disables and breakes offloading
if the packet is neither TCP nor UDP because of an erroneous default case.
No functional change in the default build because IP checksum offloading
is currently
hi,
i've spent a week trying to fix performance regression in ix(4)
since the introduction of the new driver and this is where i'm
right now. with the following change machine is able to sustain
760kpps and reach 9Gbit/s of forwarding performance.
(the other change that is very likely affecting
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
shaves off some bus read/write operations.
tested on 82598 and 82599. ok?
regenerated without git prefixes. should apply cleanly now.
diff --git dev/pci/if_ix.c dev/pci/if_ix.c
index 2c0d8e0..e3b575f 100644
--- dev/pci
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
lost while upgrading the driver. originally from claudio in rev1.46.
tested on 82599 w/ sfp+. ok?
regenerated w/o git prefixes:
diff --git dev/pci/if_ix.c dev/pci/if_ix.c
index e3b575f..cec0c99 100644
--- dev/pci
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
checksum fix from reyk (rev1.31) was lost during update:
Fix the IP ckecksum offloading logic that disables and breakes offloading
if the packet is neither TCP nor UDP because of an erroneous default case.
No functional
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
hi,
i've spent a week trying to fix performance regression in ix(4)
since the introduction of the new driver and this is where i'm
right now. with the following change machine is able to sustain
760kpps and reach 9Gbit
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Tom Murphy open...@pertho.net wrote:
You guys might want to add a note to current.html that from October
13 2011, the NAT updates have made it impossible to not use an address
family in a nat-to statement.
The following statement fails now:
match out on
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:37 AM, patrick keshishian sids...@boxsoft.com wrote:
I know nothing of IPv6 stuff, but is this line removal
a typo or an intended change?
there's a bzero call above.
you didn't remove an ip address from ral0 after bringing it down.
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:13 PM, David Coppa dco...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I stupid or there's a bug with routing?
This is what I've found when I was trying to switch from the internal
wireless card in my laptop to an external usb
it doesn't.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Gaurav Kansal kansal.gau...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea if it supports transport mode? That seems to be missing.
Regards,
Gaurav Kansal
+91 98454 22400
http://gkansal.blogspot.com
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Mike Belopuhov m
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 21:49 +0900, Ryan McBride wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:07:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
this is indeed the way it was supposed to work.
I dissagree. This is not at all what my understanding was of how it was
supposed to work. You'd have to talk to dhartmei
of problems
with assigning addresses that don't belong us.
opinions?
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 23:29 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
i saw what kame did. be my guest and try to port that.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Alexander Bluhm
alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:06:24PM
Hi,
Currently it's possible to assign *any* IPv6 source address to
the datagram sent out by the unprivileged process by supplying
a IPV6_PKTINFO control message to the sendmsg(2).
I'm not sure it's a desired behavior and afaik it's not possible
to achieve this with IPv4 sockets without the need
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Alexander Bluhm
alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:44:21AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:54:09AM +0200, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
I'll spend some more time on this, but maybe there's an IPv6 guru that
can lend a
no.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Gaurav Kansal kansal.gau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Is there a list available of supported/missing features in iked?
Regards,
Gaurav Kansal
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 11:04 -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011, Henry Precheur wrote:
According to pthread_key_create(3): Upon key creation, the value NULL is
associated with the new key in all active threads.
When pthread_key_create reuse an existing key, the old value
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 20:22 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:30:11PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
Now that we support SO_RTABLE on the socket level, it makes
sense to cleanup the tree. OK?
The if (getsockopt() errno != ENOPROTOOPT) constructs are in my opinion
hi,
the hibernate_machdep.c file depends on the acpi so it would be
nice if we excluded this file if kernel config doesn't reference
acpi. a simple fix that establishes the dependency is below. ok?
Index: arch/i386/conf/files.i386
Now that we support SO_RTABLE on the socket level, it makes
sense to cleanup the tree. OK?
Index: sbin/ping/ping.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sbin/ping/ping.c,v
retrieving revision 1.88
diff -u -p -r1.88 ping.c
--- sbin/ping/ping.c
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 13:22 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:04:24 +0200
From: Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru
hi,
the hibernate_machdep.c file depends on the acpi so it would be
nice if we excluded this file if kernel config doesn't reference
acpi
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl
wrote:
AVL trees have a difference of max 1 between the longest and shortest
path to a leaf, whereas RB-trees have at max the longest path be double
the length of the shortest path.
I.e. work case lookups require traversal
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:24 -0600, David Coppa wrote:
Hi all,
OpenBSD-current snapshot dated 16-May-2011:
I get an always-reproducible panic with softraid crypto and
kern.bufcachepercent = 75, when untarring a tarball of the
complete source tree.
The disk layout is the following, with
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Thordur Bjornsson t...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:52:44PM +0300, Michael Pounov wrote:
Add AVL tree implementation and merge few RB tree related macros.
If you have comments or any claims, please send me feedback
and I will fix them.
cool.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Jason McIntyre j...@cava.myzen.co.uk wrote:
what pf keyword addition?
Andreas asked this question in the last sentence of his email:
Is there a key word planned for this icmp6 code which could be used in PF?
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 18:27 -0400, Brad wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 09:00:45PM -0400, Brad wrote:
Some _LP64 ifdef's leftover from rev 1.1. They appear to be unnecessary
since this code is only for amd64 anyway and thus a 64-bit arch.
Actually using the same if defined checks as
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Jason McIntyre j...@cava.myzen.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:27:31AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed a typo in the icmp6(4) man page regarding icmp6 type 4 code
2.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
From: Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 13:10:10 +0400
Hello all.
Looks like there is a typo in ioctl number...
What makes you think this is a typo?
there are two ioctls with the same
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:39:01AM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
From: Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 13:10:10 +0400
hi,
recently me and jsg have figured out that a traffic burst can kill
your interface (deplete the rx ring) if you're using ipsec. the
problem is that there's no limit on number of outstanding crypto
operations. every job contains a pointer to a cluster that comes
from the nic driver.
under
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2011/05/02 22:28, Lawrence Teo wrote:
The DIOCNATLOOK example program at the end of the pf(4) man page
uses memset(3), but string.h is not included. The following diff
fixes this. Any thoughts?
That change is
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 07:53:56PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
hi,
recently me and jsg have figured out that a traffic burst can kill
your interface (deplete the rx ring) if you're using ipsec. the
problem
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:52 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:18:13PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 18:51 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:52:23PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
hi,
currently there's no way
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 16:59 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 18:58 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
this allows us to get rid of the nasty NATLOOKUP ioctl and get
the original server address right from the socket. also this
paves the way to the transparent ftp-proxy mode
hi,
currently there's no way to figure out what rdomain the diverted
connection came from. this diff introduces a neat hack that reyk
and i have invented. from the programmer's perspective this is
as simple as calling getsockopt(SO_RTABLE) on the accepted socket.
from the kernel perspective
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 18:58 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
this allows us to get rid of the nasty NATLOOKUP ioctl and get
the original server address right from the socket. also this
paves the way to the transparent ftp-proxy mode.
if you will like this diff and nobody objects, i'll try
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Alexander Bluhm
alexander.bl...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:52:23PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
currently there's no way to figure out what rdomain the diverted
connection came from. this diff introduces a neat hack that reyk
and i have invented
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 18:51 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:52:23PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
hi,
currently there's no way to figure out what rdomain the diverted
connection came from. this diff introduces a neat hack that reyk
and i have invented. from
please disregard this diff. it's wrong.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
this allows us to get rid of the nasty NATLOOKUP ioctl and get
the original server address right from the socket. also this
paves the way to the transparent ftp-proxy mode.
if you
this allows us to get rid of the nasty NATLOOKUP ioctl and get
the original server address right from the socket. also this
paves the way to the transparent ftp-proxy mode.
if you will like this diff and nobody objects, i'll try to rip
NATLOOKUP out from the other places too.
note, that it
bpf is not called on multicast/broadcast packets arriving to the carp
interface. this allows us to setup drop filters and allows tcpdump to
show all the packets.
OK/not-OK?
Index: ip_carp.c
===
RCS file:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:45 -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
recent commit to pirofti made me wonder why don't we take an advantage
of the 64 bit bswap instruction on amd64?
Here's a revised diff with two changes from Mike's:
1) use %0 instead
recent commit to pirofti made me wonder why don't we take an advantage
of the 64 bit bswap instruction on amd64?
Index: arch/amd64/include/endian.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/arch/amd64/include/endian.h,v
retrieving revision 1.3
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 14:53 +, emeric boit wrote:
Hello,
After doing a clean install of OpenBSD 4.8 (AMD64) on an IBM x3550 M3,
I find
the
system randomly panics after a period of use.
uvm_fault(0x80cc8360, 0x8000149b7000, 0, 1) - e
kernel: page
fault trap, code=0
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com wrote:
I'm not certain this is wanted, but I said I would forward along this
very simplisitc patch, so here it is. If something like this is wanted,
it can be re-worked to take multiple args to -e and such, but again,
only if
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:42 +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
you want to look up disks attached to an mpi by bus addressing, not
which raid volume you happen to be up to.
before this diff i got:
dlg@hotspare dlg$ sudo bioctl mpii0
Volume Status Size Device
mpii0 0 Online
Currenlty socket man page mentions long dead netns stack (PF_NS)
when talks about SOCK_SEQPACKET which is only valid for AF_BLUETOOTH
these days. Also it mentions SOCK_RDM that is an unused SysV compat
goo.
I think it make sense to update a reference for SOCK_SEQPACKET and
don't mention SOCK_RDM
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
And it turns out the xf86-video-ati driver has a bug very similar to
the one in xf86-video-r128. This makes my XVR-100 restore the video
mode a blade2k.
this fixes the named problem for me on mac mini g4 with
in the simple setup, like the one described in the pr 6564,
pf won't rewrite source address for the icmp errors (like
destination unreachable) when doing rdr-to.
this diff fixes issue for me and a pr originator. comments?
do we want to put it into 4.9?
Index: pf.c
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:25 +0100, Lukasz Czarniecki wrote:
Hi
I've bought a Dell R310 with H200 raid controller reported in dmesg as:
Symbios Logic SAS2008. It uses mpii driver and has two hard drives
configured in RAID 1.
Now it seems to work fine but i still have a problem with its
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 02:03:25PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
we can check if af == inet in icmp case obviously, but how and why
can we end up with af == inet6 and an icmp payload (or af == inet
and icmp6 payload
hi, in pf_translate, when we're changing addresses for the icmp messages
there's an unjustified fallthrough in the IPPROTO_ICMPV6 case. in fact
this doesn't seem to harm anything because default case performs the
same operation. note that pd-ip_sum is null in ipv6 case so pf_change_a6
just
a network cable
- watchdog timeouts
Mike Belopuhov found another logic bug, updated diff follows.
cf http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=129639859909043w=2
-int alc_match(struct device *, void *, void *);
+int alc_probe(struct device *, void *, void *);
please don't rename functions like
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Brad b...@comstyle.com wrote:
Also that second chunk of alc_newbuf from mikeb@ doesn't look right.
There is a logic error with the way its written but it looks like it should
be moved further down within the function.
there's a call to the bus_dmamap_unload
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:31 +0200, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
--- interrupt ---
end trace frame: 0x0, count: 245
0x8:
End of stack trace.
pppoe0: received unexpected PADO
pppoe0: chap failure
pppoe: GENERIC ERROR: RP-PPPoE: Child pppd process terminated
pppoe0: received unexpected PADO
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Joel Sing j...@sing.id.au wrote:
pool_get() with PR_NOWAIT... and then not checking the return value? That's
got null pointer dereference written all over it... :)
However, the bigger problem is what can you then do if the pool_get() fails?
This then results
801 - 900 of 959 matches
Mail list logo
