Re: wg destroy hangs

2023-10-04 Thread Sonic
ing to get the interface back up. Was running -current at the time as well as now. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 12:05 PM Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 10:53:30AM -0400, Sonic wrote: > > When it happened to me back then (2022) I'm pretty sure I did a "down&qu

Re: wg destroy hangs

2023-10-04 Thread Sonic
When it happened to me back then (2022) I'm pretty sure I did a "down" followed by a "delete" and then the "destroy". Have not tried to recreate since then. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:31 AM Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 10:08:01AM -04

Re: wg destroy hangs

2023-10-04 Thread Sonic
See the post: "Uninterruptible D State after ifconfig wg0 destroy" Oct. 31, 2022 in the Bugs archive. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sonic wrote: > This goes back a ways, to at least 7.2 in October 2022. > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 8:54 AM Kirill Miazine wrote: > &

Re: wg destroy hangs

2023-10-04 Thread Sonic
This goes back a ways, to at least 7.2 in October 2022. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 8:54 AM Kirill Miazine wrote: > Recently on snapshots I have noticed that ifconfig wgN destroy would > just hang there, without any way to get back the control. Power reset > would be the only way to reboot and

Re: em(4) multiqueue

2023-04-13 Thread Sonic
Is this multiqueue support in 7.3 or does it require patching? According to Intel the i211 should have 2 queues but I see no msi-x support in dmesg: em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I211" rev 0x03: msi, address Thanks. Chris

Re: WireGuard patchset for OpenBSD, rev. 3

2020-06-21 Thread Sonic
Along that line, does wireguard have any problems using alias addresses? It's not a problem with IKEv1 but it is with IKEv2. Thanks! Chris

Re: serious watchdog timeout issues with em driver

2015-11-20 Thread Sonic
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > I just committed a revert to 1.305 keeping the API changes needed for > the driver to build. > > This should bring your stability back, please let us know if that's not > the case. The kernel/driver builds with those

Re: serious watchdog timeout issues with em driver

2015-11-20 Thread Sonic
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Thanks Martin. All is fine now. System booted with no errors and no watchdog timeouts. Thanks to all. Chris

serious watchdog timeout issues with em driver

2015-11-19 Thread Sonic
Have serious problems for over 7 weeks now with em driver, specifically any rev of if_em.c > 1.305. Starting with rev 1.306, released on 2015/09/30 and continuing to -current, watchdog timeouts rue the day. Unfortunately rev 1.305 no longer builds with -current as it appears the patch in rev

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts

2015-11-13 Thread Sonic
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Gregor Best wrote: > I've done some further testing and I think I've narrowed it down to the > "Unlocking em(4) a bit further"-patch [0]. That was the start of it for me. When I could revert to rev 1.305 for if_em.c and rev 1.57 for if_em.h

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts

2015-11-04 Thread Sonic
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Sonic <sonicsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there anything else I can provide to assist in finding a cure for this > issue? Not sure this helps at all but the specific error I get is "em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting". In this case em0 is t

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts

2015-11-04 Thread Sonic
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Sonic <sonicsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry to report that the diff does not solve the timeout problem here. > > All was working fine with the if_em* versions from 2015/09/29 (I > downgraded to this version per Stuarts post on 10-14): > &quo

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts

2015-11-02 Thread Sonic
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Can those that are experiencing watchdog timeouts check if the diff > below gets rid of them? Sorry to report that the diff does not solve the timeout problem here. All was working fine with the if_em* versions from