On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 01:55:30PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> New drives have much more sophisticated IO queueing algorithms and
> posses much more information about the physical limitations of drive
> platters (or lack thereof) than an OS can ever hope to have. So switch
> SCSI (and SATA) dr
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> To help investigate some changes recently, I wrote a tool that will
> extract (reverse) patches from cvs. I was telling a coworker about this
> today, and he said it was a lot like cvsps. Maybe it is, but cvsps chokes
> big time tr
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:20:58AM -0600, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 13, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > To help investigate some changes recently, I wrote a tool that will
> > > extract (reverse) patches from cvs. I wa
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 07:45:28PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm doing some testing with DNSSEC now that root are signed but it
> seems BIND-9.4.2-P2 (provided with OpenBSD 4.7) is not able to load
> the trust-anchor :
>
> Jul 18 19:35:22 rb600a named[11605]: loading configurat
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:08:11PM +0200, Martin Toft wrote:
> Hi
>
> Attending a firewall talk at a nerdy summer camp [0], I decided to check
> out the current, default pf.conf. There is no reason to exclude lo0 in
> the block rule for X11, since the lo interface group is skipped.
> Additionally
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:34:30AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Thordur I Bjornsson wrote:
> > +/* Global vfs data structures for cd9660. */
> > +struct vops cd9660_vops = {
> > + ? ? ? .vop_default ? ?= eopnotsupp,
> > + ? ? ? .vop
As seen on misc@, and also by myself sometime ago, but I forgot about
it as work got hectic and I was moving.
Anyways, vr(4) will not even surivie a few ping -f's, before the pools
become corrupt, this has (obviously) something todo with how MCLGETI
takes and puts buf's of the rings;
Reverting MC
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 06:46:53PM -0400, Brynet wrote:
> Evening,
>
> I have two machines with vr(4) interfaces running 4.7, and I can't seem
> to find any problem running ping -f against them.
>
> vr0 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 "VIA VT6105 RhineIII" rev 0x86: apic 2 int
> 19 (irq 10), address 00
Hi gang,
Diff cut's swapping to regular files over to using bufq's.
- There is no point is using BUFQ_DISKSORT, as we don't know
what the underlying device is, and it has it's own bufq any
way, hence bufq fifo.
- sw_reg_start can end up calling into VOP_STRATEGY() from the
biodone() callbac
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:11:39AM +, Thordur I Bjornsson wrote:
> Hi gang,
Gabriel Kihlman spotted a small problem, swd_active was not
being incremented.
Here's an updated diff.
Index: sys/buf.h
===
RCS fil
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:57:58PM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 02:07:03PM +0000, Thordur I Bjornsson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:11:39AM +, Thordur I Bjornsson wrote:
> > > Hi gang,
> >
> > Gabriel Kihlman spotted a sma
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 04:39:33PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:07:03 +
> > From: Thordur I Bjornsson
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:11:39AM +0000, Thordur I Bjornsson wrote:
> > > Hi gang,
> >
> > Gabriel Ki
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 07:03:24PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> >
>
> > > Basically by saying you will prevent swap is that you will make a
> > situation
> > > where you ask for a page of memory and don't get it because you are
> > > suspending.
> >
> > Nothing the kernel needs to touch is swappable.
i've always been annoyed with the oh so very generic name
"lookup" for the vfs lookup routine, so rename it and the
relookup routine to vfs_lookup and vfs_relookup.
comments/oks?
Index: kern/vfs_lookup.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/s
These two have been pet peeves of mine for some time and I think
they are ripe for the attic.
VATTR_NULL -> vattr_null;
NULLVP -> NULL;
Note, I left the regres for diff alone, there no need to change it.
Comments/OKs?
Index: share/man/man9/getdevvp.9
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:54:13PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:05:53PM +0000, Thordur I Bjornsson wrote:
> > These two have been pet peeves of mine for some time and I think
> > they are ripe for the attic.
> >
> > VATTR_NULL ->
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:44:12AM +0200, merlyn wrote:
> I found out (thanks Stuart Henderson), that kmail replaces tabs with
> spaces, so patch is not appliable, so I've uploaded the patches here:
This is the complication.
When looking at diffs, people want them _in the message body_ not becaus
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:22:25PM -0700, Chris Palmer wrote:
> -Where necessary, produce "human-readable" output.
> +Where necessary, produce ``human-readable'' output.
Why is this better ? (I'm not a native english speaker, so I'm genuinely asking)
> -# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd3c bs=1m count=
Joachim Schipper wrote on Sat 9.May'09 at
12:20:25 +0200
> The bioctl(8) man page helpfully suggests dd for zeroing out the
> disklabel etc. on the new disk. However, the command doesn't work, since
> OpenBSD's dd doesn't understand '1M'.
>
> It may be slightly more readable to use 'bs=1024 co
Hi gang...
It would be great if people running NFS (soft, and hard mounts)
could give this diff a spin. what it does essentially is to redo
the retransmission booking by keeping count of maximum rexmits in
one place (the nfsmount structure) and kill deadthresh, (an nqnfs
left over); that causes a
Mike Erdely wrote on Wed 3.Jun'09 at 21:29:57 -0400
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:19:15PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's a diff to make ksh vi mode handle werase more like vi. It's
> > really irritating to have whole paths go away on ^W instead of just the
> > last bit.
>
Dorian B|ttner wrote on Fri 12.Jun'09 at 19:25:05 +0200
AFAIK the whole work was done to make the cache more sane. The current
version is just insane enough that Bob was crying, shouting and playing
with red wine bottles during c2k9.
> Hi Bob,
>
> tried your patch, got
Stuart Henderson wrote on Fri 19.Jun'09 at 20:56:24 +0100
> The FAQ uses "nobody" to run netcat in an example; this should
> be changed to a different user. Do people think "proxy" would be
> appropriate or should we use something else?
Don't know about "proxy". But it definitly should not use n
Jason McIntyre wrote on Wed 24.Jun'09 at 14:22:20 +0100
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:15:06PM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> >
> > If anyone is interested, here is a patch to mount_nfs' man page, to include
> > mount_nfs(8) parameters' long versions (the fstab(5) style long versions).
> > Perhaps r
viq wrote on Fri 26.Jun'09 at 14:45:04 +0200
> Since the user created during installation is somewhat marketed as "root
> replacement", shouldn't he be added to staff login class ?
Yes, I'd actually love that. Then I could use it.
krw ?
Olivier Cherrier wrote on Wed 12.Aug'09 at 3:17:16 -0400
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:43:34AM -0600, b...@openbsd.org wrote:
> > After having fast recycle kick my butt for two days finding
> > vnode reuse bugs.. here is the new diff. this does appear stable on
> > my machines.
> >
> >
Simon Nicolussi wrote on Sat 5.Sep'09 at
1:59:04 +0200
> Hi,
>
> one of the recent changes to tmux has the unintented side-effect that
> all clients are being redrawn every second. This is visible for people
> with slow terminals and furthermore makes copying text with the mouse
> quite trick
Y'all,
During some refactoring work, the volume size calculation for the concat
discipline got lost, resulting in zero sized volumes.
http://secnorth.net/diffs/softraid-concat.diff:
diff --git a/sys/dev/softraid_concat.c b/sys/dev/softraid_concat.c
index 90cb12c8b6e..11fbf8ddb3f 100644
--- a/sys
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 9:15 PM Bob Beck wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:01:18AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > + KASSERTMSG(1, "Ich Habe eine Rotweinflarsche in meinem Arsche");
> > That part of the diff is not OK. If everyone did this, we would have a
> > mess on our hands.
> (or I
29 matches
Mail list logo
