On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Ryan McBride wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:45:01PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
>> > >> If there is anyone out there who disables fragment reassembly
>> (enabled
>
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Ryan McBride wrote:
>
>> If there is anyone out there who disables fragment reassembly (enabled
>> by default), you need to help testing this diff which folds
>> pf_tes
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Ryan McBride wrote:
> If there is anyone out there who disables fragment reassembly (enabled
> by default), you need to help testing this diff which folds
> pf_test_fragment() into pf_test_rule().
>
> If I don't hear from anyone we may one day decide that nobody ac
