Maybe we can also hardcode the alias rm='rm -i', just in case.
Your intentions are nice, but that are too much lines for a naive test
that a serious 'root' would have hit with a simple -and mandatory-
'pfctl -s rules'.
El 02/01/2012 18:59, Stephane A. Sezer escribis:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012
Hi,
I found a strange behavior in pfctl(8) which looks like a bug.
When given a directory as input (either with the `-f` flag, or with the
`include` directive in a config file), pfctl(8) does not emit any
warning and silently accepts the given input.
I suppose this is not the intended behavior
what next? having pfctl whine about an empty config file?
* Stephane A. Sezer s...@cd80.net [2012-01-02 09:36]:
Hi,
I found a strange behavior in pfctl(8) which looks like a bug.
When given a directory as input (either with the `-f` flag, or with the
`include` directive in a config file),
On 2 January 2012 06:58, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
what next? having pfctl whine about an empty config file?
* Stephane A. Sezer s...@cd80.net [2012-01-02 09:36]:
Hi,
I found a strange behavior in pfctl(8) which looks like a bug.
When given a directory as input
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:28:48 -0200
Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 2 January 2012 06:58, Henning Brauer lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de wrote:
what next? having pfctl whine about an empty config file?
* Stephane A. Sezer s...@cd80.net [2012-01-02 09:36]:
Hi,
I
