Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-07-31 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 09:54:27AM -0600, Gavin Howard wrote: > Whoops; I thought Theo would make the decision, and his last email made > me think he might have. > > I am happy to help as much as I can to make the process easy for you. > > In the meantime, I think I will release 5.0.0 when it's

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-07-30 Thread Gavin Howard
Whoops; I thought Theo would make the decision, and his last email made me think he might have. I am happy to help as much as I can to make the process easy for you. In the meantime, I think I will release 5.0.0 when it's ready. I'll take into account your feedback in a future release. Gavin

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-07-30 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:31:34PM -0600, Gavin Howard wrote: > Hello, > > At this point, because of the lack of reply, I am going to assume that > my proposal is rejected. While I am sad, I understand. > > Thank you for taking the time to consider my proposal. > > Gavin Howard > I just did

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-07-29 Thread Gavin Howard
Hello, At this point, because of the lack of reply, I am going to assume that my proposal is rejected. While I am sad, I understand. Thank you for taking the time to consider my proposal. Gavin Howard

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-06-17 Thread enh
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 9:48 AM Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:01:02AM -0600, Gavin Howard wrote: > > > Otto, > > > > > I think it is interesting. As for the incompatibilites, my memory says > > > I followed the original dc and bc when deciding on those (GNU chose to > > >

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-06-17 Thread enh
it's perhaps worth mentioning in the "pros" column that toybox (a 0BSD-licensed busybox which provides most of /bin on Android, which i maintain) and busybox both use Gavin's bc/dc implementations[1]. so although the GNU versions are their own thing and i assume likely to stay that way, "all

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-06-17 Thread Gavin Howard
Mr. de Raadt, > Eyes will usually look at the version they are used to, and any effort > to shink the number of versions will probably fail to re-adapt those > eyes towards looking at another version with the same focus, as they are > not familiar with the replacement. I think you are correct

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-06-17 Thread Theo de Raadt
enh wrote: > heh. while i know what Theo means -- and his is also a valid philosophical > standpoint -- this kind of thing is one reason why i personally prefer > fewer implementations of things and more shared code between them :-) > > at least it leads to more consistency, and to having fewer

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-06-17 Thread Theo de Raadt
Having fewer versions of software is not neccessarily a plus. It is easily considered a negative. enh wrote: > it's perhaps worth mentioning in the "pros" column that toybox (a > 0BSD-licensed busybox which provides most of /bin on Android, which i > maintain) and busybox both use Gavin's

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-06-17 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:01:02AM -0600, Gavin Howard wrote: > Otto, > > > I think it is interesting. As for the incompatibilites, my memory says > > I followed the original dc and bc when deciding on those (GNU chose to > > differs in these cases). Bit it has been 18 years since I wrote the >

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-06-17 Thread Gavin Howard
Otto, > I think it is interesting. As for the incompatibilites, my memory says > I followed the original dc and bc when deciding on those (GNU chose to > differs in these cases). Bit it has been 18 years since I wrote the > current versions, so I might misrememeber. I think that makes sense to

Re: [CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-06-17 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:40:08PM -0600, Gavin Howard wrote: > Hello, > > My name is Gavin Howard. I have developed a new bc(1) and dc(1) > implementation. [0] > > I propose replacing the current implementations with mine. > > Advantages: > > * Performance. [1] > * Extensions for ease of

[CAN IGNORE] Proposal for new bc(1) and dc(1)

2021-06-16 Thread Gavin Howard
Hello, My name is Gavin Howard. I have developed a new bc(1) and dc(1) implementation. [0] I propose replacing the current implementations with mine. Advantages: * Performance. [1] * Extensions for ease of use. * With build options to remove most extensions, if desired. * Compatible with GNU