On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:46:15AM +, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:12:32PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:50:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:12:32PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Am 01.06.2015 um 01:25
> Sure. Fine with me. Wondering if the -1 check is needed. IIRC close(-1);
> is save. Anyway you want to add a space after the if.
One side effect: it changes errno. But I don't see an impact immediately.
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:12:32PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am 01.06.2015 um 01:25 schrieb Todd Mortimer :
> > > >
> > > > I agree that my patch is more of
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
> >
> > > Am 01.06.2015 um 01:25 schrieb Todd Mortimer :
> > >
> > > I agree that my patch is more of a workaround, and it would be
> > > better to track down how it is that
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
>
> > Am 01.06.2015 um 01:25 schrieb Todd Mortimer :
> >
> > I agree that my patch is more of a workaround, and it would be
> > better to track down how it is that the client is being passed to
> > server_fcgi with an open socket. I was
> Am 01.06.2015 um 01:25 schrieb Todd Mortimer :
>
> I agree that my patch is more of a workaround, and it would be
> better to track down how it is that the client is being passed to
> server_fcgi with an open socket. I was going this way when I started
> looking at the source, but then I saw th
On Sun, 31 May 2015 19:25:22 -0400
Todd Mortimer wrote:
Hi tech@,
> Hi Joerg,
>
> Thanks for getting back to me.
>
> I cloned the server and upgraded it to the 31 May snapshot, did the
> sysmerge and upgraded the packages to the snapshot versions.
>
> The behaviour is still there. It actuall
Hi Joerg,
Thanks for getting back to me.
I cloned the server and upgraded it to the 31 May snapshot, did the
sysmerge and upgraded the packages to the snapshot versions.
The behaviour is still there. It actually appears to be somewhat
more pronounced, and php-fpm hits max_children more quickly
Hi,
> Am 20.05.2015 um 02:06 schrieb Todd Mortimer :
>
> The attached patch fixes a problem I’ve been having with httpd +
> php_fpm + owncloud on 5.7. The patch is against 5.7-release.
Can you try with recent snapshot, and see if issue
still occurs, please?
Development happens in -current.
> Af
Hi tech,
The attached patch fixes a problem I’ve been having with httpd +
php_fpm + owncloud on 5.7. The patch is against 5.7-release.
After several days running owncloud with httpd, php_fpm started
complaining about hitting pm.max_children, and top would show a
bunch of idle php_fpm processes wa
11 matches
Mail list logo