On 12/30/20 9:27 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 08:57 +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>> On 12/20/20 12:21 AM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>>> December 19, 2020 11:26 PM, "Martijn van Duren"
>>> wrote:
>>>
Personally I'd rather wait to keep the names in sync, especially since
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 09:27:34 +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 08:57 +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > On 12/20/20 12:21 AM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> > > December 19, 2020 11:26 PM, "Martijn van Duren" alat.at> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Personally I'd rather wait to keep the na
On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 08:57 +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 12/20/20 12:21 AM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> > December 19, 2020 11:26 PM, "Martijn van Duren"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Personally I'd rather wait to keep the names in sync, especially since
> > > it's an easy 2 line diff that can easily
On 12/20/20 12:21 AM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> December 19, 2020 11:26 PM, "Martijn van Duren"
> wrote:
>
>> Personally I'd rather wait to keep the names in sync, especially since
>> it's an easy 2 line diff that can easily be incorperated in the bigger
>> thing. But it's not something I'm goin
it's slightly different:
ca is for "crypto agent" unsure if there's really an interest in renaming
internally,
furthermore there's a separate crypto API for encrypted queue so not
distinguishing
between crypto api and crypto agent might be confusing.
Gilles
December 27, 2020 5:43 PM, "Martijn
In that case fine by me.
Anyone else want to chime in?
On Sun, 2020-12-27 at 17:04 +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> it's slightly different:
>
> ca is for "crypto agent" unsure if there's really an interest in renaming
> internally,
> furthermore there's a separate crypto API for encrypted queue
This one reads OK to me, with one minor bikeshed:
You rename klondike to crypto, but the internals still refer to CA
everywhere. Wouldn't it be cleaner to leave klondike in step one and do
a s/CA/CRYPTO/ in a second step so everything is in concent?
Personally I prefer the name crypto over ca.
mar
December 19, 2020 11:26 PM, "Martijn van Duren"
wrote:
> Personally I'd rather wait to keep the names in sync, especially since
> it's an easy 2 line diff that can easily be incorperated in the bigger
> thing. But it's not something I'm going to loose sleep over if others
> thing it can go in ri
I agree but I thought this should be done in a second time as it is quite
invasive and not required for the change to be visible outside the daemon
December 19, 2020 11:13 PM, "Martijn van Duren"
wrote:
> I'm in favour of this change, since I like proper nomenclature.
> But I think you should
Hello,
A very long time ago, smtpd had several more processes which then got factored
into a single one. We couldn't find a decent name back then but since a hacker
had requested a pony from me I temporarily named the process "pony express" as
it was in charge of delivering mail. Later, reyk impro
I like it. I always forget which role the pony process performs.
- todd
Personally I'd rather wait to keep the names in sync, especially since
it's an easy 2 line diff that can easily be incorperated in the bigger
thing. But it's not something I'm going to loose sleep over if others
thing it can go in right now.
On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 22:22 +, gil...@poolp.org wrot
I'm in favour of this change, since I like proper nomenclature.
But I think you should push this one to its logical conclusion and also
rename the enum and potential other pony/klondike references, because
with your diff the naming is inconsistent, which is even more confusing.
martijn@
On Sat, 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
