On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:01:03PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Hi, Please don't forget to include Otto's license to the code, that
> > you modified.
> >
>
> Thanks for this reminder. Please accept my apologies, I'm not very
> familiar with the customs of licencing which doesn't exist i
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:01:03PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Hi, Please don't forget to include Otto's license to the code, that
> > you modified.
> >
>
> Thanks for this reminder. Please accept my apologies, I'm not very
> familiar with the customs of licencing which doesn't exist in my
>
> Hi, Please don't forget to include Otto's license to the code, that
> you modified.
>
Thanks for this reminder. Please accept my apologies, I'm not very
familiar with the customs of licencing which doesn't exist in my
profession.
Would this be a satisfactory way of fulfilling your request?
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Theo Buehler wrote:
> This set of three patches adds overflow checking to ksh in the spirit
> of the malloc(A*B) -> reallocarray(NULL, A, B) conversions that were
> ongoing since last summer. I've been running these patches on my main
> laptop since January on am
This set of three patches adds overflow checking to ksh in the spirit
of the malloc(A*B) -> reallocarray(NULL, A, B) conversions that were
ongoing since last summer. I've been running these patches on my main
laptop since January on amd64/CURRENT and didn't notice any issues.
ksh has its own memo
