Re: Clarify relevance of PF FAQ
On 2015/09/25 19:34, Michael McConville wrote: > Assuming that what's described applies to the most recent releases. You > could also argue that this disclaimer is old enough to be deleted. Thanks - I've deleted it.
Clarify relevance of PF FAQ
Assuming that what's described applies to the most recent releases. You could also argue that this disclaimer is old enough to be deleted. Index: faq/pf/nat.html === RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/pf/nat.html,v retrieving revision 1.54 diff