Re: Clarify relevance of PF FAQ

2015-09-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/09/25 19:34, Michael McConville wrote: > Assuming that what's described applies to the most recent releases. You > could also argue that this disclaimer is old enough to be deleted. Thanks - I've deleted it.

Clarify relevance of PF FAQ

2015-09-25 Thread Michael McConville
Assuming that what's described applies to the most recent releases. You could also argue that this disclaimer is old enough to be deleted. Index: faq/pf/nat.html === RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/pf/nat.html,v retrieving revision 1.54 diff