On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Артур Истомин wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:34:36PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > >Log message:
> > >Remove the GOST engine: It is not compiled or used and depends on the
> > >"dynamic engine" feature that is not enabled in our build. People who
> > >nee
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 08:15:02AM +, Артур Истомин wrote:
> I assumed that, for establishment GOST, it is enough to recompile
> OpenSSL in source tree and install it. Situation worsens in that it is
> the only implementation of GOST, so that there are no alternatives for
> unix and unix-like s
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:34:36PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >Log message:
> >Remove the GOST engine: It is not compiled or used and depends on the
> >"dynamic engine" feature that is not enabled in our build. People who
> >need it can still pull it out of the Attic; if it is to have a Russian
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:24:48PM +, �?�?�?�?�? �?�?�?омин wrote:
> Log message:
> Remove the GOST engine: It is not compiled or used and depends on the
> "dynamic engine" feature that is not enabled in our build. People who
> need it can still pull it out of the Attic; if it is to have
> In the interests of full disclosure, do you work for the government or
> sell to the government?
And in the interests of full disclosure, please note, It's absolutely
not political. We just deleted all the FIPS junk too.
the right way to add GOST if you need it is not as an engine, but as a
wor
>Log message:
>Remove the GOST engine: It is not compiled or used and depends on the
>"dynamic engine" feature that is not enabled in our build. People who
>need it can still pull it out of the Attic; if it is to have a Russian
>engine just because it's a Russian engine.
>-
Log message:
Remove the GOST engine: It is not compiled or used and depends on the
"dynamic engine" feature that is not enabled in our build. People who
need it can still pull it out of the Attic; if it is to have a Russian
engine just because it's a Russian engine.
---
