Re: PATCH: rad(8) Better PIO default lifetimes (was: Re: Improve handling of IPv6 SLAAC renumbering scenarios)

2020-04-02 Thread Florian Obser
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:10:25PM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote: > Florian/folks, > > This is an improved version: > > Essentially, if the lifetime of a prefix is not specified (i.e., the admin > relies on the default values), the Preferred Lifetime is set to the Router > Lifetime, and the Valid Li

PATCH: rad(8) Better PIO default lifetimes (was: Re: Improve handling of IPv6 SLAAC renumbering scenarios)

2020-03-27 Thread Fernando Gont
Florian/folks, This is an improved version: Essentially, if the lifetime of a prefix is not specified (i.e., the admin relies on the default values), the Preferred Lifetime is set to the Router Lifetime, and the Valid Lifetime is set to Router Lifetime * 48 (one day) This improve the state

Re: Improve handling of IPv6 SLAAC renumbering scenarios

2020-03-15 Thread Denis Fondras
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:54:20PM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote: > Folks, > > This improves IPv6 SLAAC handling of renumbering scenarios. At the time of > this writing, this doesn't follow the spec, but is the right thing. > > Essentially, PIOs will employ these default values: > Preferred Lifetime

Improve handling of IPv6 SLAAC renumbering scenarios

2020-03-14 Thread Fernando Gont
Folks, This improves IPv6 SLAAC handling of renumbering scenarios. At the time of this writing, this doesn't follow the spec, but is the right thing. Essentially, PIOs will employ these default values: Preferred Lifetime = Router Lifetime (as sent by router, defaulting to 1800) Valid Lifetime=