Re: Invalid HTML entities in upgrade57.html

2015-09-26 Thread Nick Holland
On 09/25/15 12:57, Kevin Zhang wrote: > Using >, & in raw text is invalid HTML. Not according to validator.w3.org. And unless you can point to an actual PROBLEM...this makes the page a lot more of a pain to maintain. There was an actual validation problem, which you prompted me to test for and,

Invalid HTML entities in upgrade57.html

2015-09-25 Thread Kevin Zhang
Using >, & in raw text is invalid HTML. Index: faq/upgrade57.html === RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/upgrade57.html,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.8 upgrade57.html --- faq/upgrade57.html 8 Jul 2015 01:11:32 - 1.8 +++

Re: Invalid HTML entities in upgrade57.html

2015-09-25 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Kevin Zhang writes: > Using >, & in raw text is invalid HTML. You're right about &, but > does not need to be escaped. -- Anthony J. Bentley

Re: Invalid HTML entities in upgrade57.html

2015-09-25 Thread Ted Unangst
Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Kevin Zhang writes: > > Using >, & in raw text is invalid HTML. > > You're right about &, but > does not need to be escaped. Even & only needs escaping if the following letters could be interpreted as an entity... Since & is only followed by & and space, that's not