On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:04:13PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:53:20 +0100
> > From: Joerg Sonnenberger
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:24:50PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Sorry, but I disagree with LLVM here. It shouldn't complain about
> > > static inline
> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:53:20 +0100
> From: Joerg Sonnenberger
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:24:50PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Sorry, but I disagree with LLVM here. It shouldn't complain about
> > static inline functions.
>
> Then mark them as unused, just like you would with a static
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:24:50PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Sorry, but I disagree with LLVM here. It shouldn't complain about
> static inline functions.
Then mark them as unused, just like you would with a static variable you
insist on keeping.
Joerg
> Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 17:55:00 -0500
> From: Brad Smith
>
> Put UREAD4 under #ifdef UHCI_DEBUG as it is only used by a function
> for debugging which is also under UHCI_DEBUG.
>
> uhci.c:256:1: error: unused function 'UREAD4' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>
> OK?
Sorry, but I disagree with LLV
Put UREAD4 under #ifdef UHCI_DEBUG as it is only used by a function
for debugging which is also under UHCI_DEBUG.
uhci.c:256:1: error: unused function 'UREAD4' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
OK?
Index: uhci.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/s
