Hi Rafael,
Rafael Sadowski wrote on Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 08:22:06AM +0200:
> On Mon Sep 27, 2021 at 11:20:55PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> Oh, like how about you try compiling a kernel after your proposed diff?
>>
>> in userland -
>>size_t comes from sys/types.h
>>or a header file
On Mon Sep 27, 2021 at 11:20:55PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Oh, like how about you try compiling a kernel after your proposed diff?
>
> in userland -
>size_t comes from sys/types.h
>or a header file which pulls in sys/types.h, and there should be
>no further new iteration added
>
Oh, like how about you try compiling a kernel after your proposed diff?
in userland -
size_t comes from sys/types.h
or a header file which pulls in sys/types.h, and there should be
no further new iteration added
in kernel -
size_t comes from either sys/param.h or sys/types.h,
device.h misses a definition of size_t
/usr/include/sys/device.h:128:2: error: unknown type name 'size_t'
Index: device.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/device.h,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -p -r1.55 device.h
--- device.h
