The return of EINVAL on fp NULL comes from me. I think its even an
invalid argument like the other pointers. The rest should be fine now.
Thank you.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 02:15:28AM +, Federico Schwindt wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de wrote:
Hi
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:45:58 +0100
From: Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de
The return of EINVAL on fp NULL comes from me. I think its even an
invalid argument like the other pointers.
We tend to take the position that it is better to crash hard that
return an error if an invalid argument
sounds reasonable.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:18:42PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:45:58 +0100
From: Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de
The return of EINVAL on fp NULL comes from me. I think its even an
invalid argument like the other pointers.
We tend to
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:45:58 +0100
From: Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de
The return of EINVAL on fp NULL comes from me. I think its even an
invalid argument like the other pointers.
We tend to take the
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:02:59 +
From: Federico Schwindt fg...@lodoss.net
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:45:58 +0100
From: Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de
The return of EINVAL on fp NULL comes from me. I
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Jan Klemkow j.klem...@wemelug.de wrote:
Here is my diff for the renaming of the getline function in base.
Please, test it and tell me everything that is wrong with it.
Thanks for the diff.
I will let you know if there are any problems, otherwise it will be
Here is my diff for the renaming of the getline function in base.
Please, test it and tell me everything that is wrong with it.
--
Jan
Index: bin/pax/options.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/pax/options.c,v
retrieving revision 1.74
pax(1).
--steffen
Index: bin/pax/options.c
===
RCS file: /Users/steffen/arena/code.openbsd/src/bin/pax/options.c,v
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -a -p -u -r1.74 options.c
--- bin/pax/options.c 2 Dec 2010 04:08:27 - 1.74
unifdef(1).
(Should complete bin and usr.bin.)
(Did i press 'g' all the time? Sorry if not!)
--steffen
Index: usr.bin/unifdef/unifdef.c
===
RCS file: /Users/steffen/arena/code.openbsd/src/usr.bin/unifdef/unifdef.c,v
retrieving
(All compile-tested after applying the patches.)
--steffen
uudecode(1).
--steffen
Index: usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c
===
RCS file: /Users/steffen/arena/code.openbsd/src/usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -a -p -u -r1.17 uudecode.c
--- usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c 27
lpr(1).
--steffen
Index: usr.sbin/lpr/common_source/common.c
===
RCS file:
/Users/steffen/arena/code.openbsd/src/usr.sbin/lpr/common_source/common.c,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -a -p -u -r1.33 common.c
---
diff3(1).
--steffen
Index: usr.bin/diff3/diff3prog.c
===
RCS file: /Users/steffen/arena/code.openbsd/src/usr.bin/diff3/diff3prog.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -a -p -u -r1.11 diff3prog.c
--- usr.bin/diff3/diff3prog.c 27 Oct
Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that the base is unlocked, we can consider diffs to
a) rename getdelim() and getline() symbols that are already in the tree, and
b) add getdelim() and getline() to libc.
Note that (a) will need to go in before (b)...
I also expect some fallout
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 04:50:21PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that the base is unlocked, we can consider diffs to
a) rename getdelim() and getline() symbols that are already in the tree, and
b) add getdelim() and getline() to libc.
Now that the base is unlocked, we can consider diffs to
a) rename getdelim() and getline() symbols that are already in the tree, and
b) add getdelim() and getline() to libc.
Note that (a) will need to go in before (b)...
Philip Guenther
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 05:00:55PM +0100, Jan Klemkow wrote:
I decide to remove the check for the negative delimiter character, but
I am not sure, with the file handle pointer check!? In my opinion this
should be checked and return an minus 1 with an error for invalid input.
The realloc(2)
Hello,
I miss some std libc functions in OpenBSD. So, I deside to implement a
few of them by myself. This is a diff for getdelim(3) and getline(3).
Which are described here:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/getdelim.html
The manpage tooked from NetBSD, because I am not
On 26/01/12 5:03 PM, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hello,
I miss some std libc functions in OpenBSD. So, I deside to implement a
few of them by myself. This is a diff for getdelim(3) and getline(3).
Which are described here:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/getdelim.html
Seeing
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, Jan Klemkow wrote:
I miss some std libc functions in OpenBSD. So, I deside to implement a
few of them by myself. This is a diff for getdelim(3) and getline(3).
it is too late for this release, I'd advise sending again once 5.1 is
released.
At the moment this patch
20 matches
Mail list logo
