Re: Possible em(4) fix

> From: Alexis VACHETTE > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:24:27 +0100 > > Hi Mark, > > If you need a box for testing purpose on this issue. > > I can provide you bug reports when I will get a spare box which trigger > the watchdog timeout. Time is the scarce resource here.

Re: Possible em(4) fix

Hi Mark, If you need a box for testing purpose on this issue. I can provide you bug reports when I will get a spare box which trigger the watchdog timeout. In my case it's only with trunk device on failover mode so far. Regards, Alexis VACHETTE* * On 05/10/2015 22:45, Mark Kettenis wrote:

Re: Possible em(4) fix

On 6 October 2015 at 14:34, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Mike Belopuhov >> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:18:39 +0200 >> >> On 5 October 2015 at 22:45, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> > Several people seem to complain on misc@ that

Re: Possible em(4) fix

On 5 October 2015 at 22:45, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Several people seem to complain on misc@ that they're seeing watchdog > timeouts on em(4). But none of them bother to submit a proper bug > report to bugs@. Anyway, here is a diff that might fix the issue. > Please

Re: Possible em(4) fix

> From: Mike Belopuhov > Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:18:39 +0200 > > On 5 October 2015 at 22:45, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Several people seem to complain on misc@ that they're seeing watchdog > > timeouts on em(4). But none of them bother to submit a

Possible em(4) fix

Several people seem to complain on misc@ that they're seeing watchdog timeouts on em(4). But none of them bother to submit a proper bug report to bugs@. Anyway, here is a diff that might fix the issue. Please test, even if you're not experiencing any problems. Thanks, Mark Index: if_em.c

Re: Possible em(4) fix

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Several people seem to complain on misc@ that they're seeing watchdog > timeouts on em(4). But none of them bother to submit a proper bug > report to bugs@. Anyway, here is a diff that might fix the issue. > Please