Hello,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 02:34:03PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > I'm sorry, but this is terrible. (Not your effort, which is
> > appreciated, but the whole function.) I do not like the idea of
> > adding a "be extra carefu
> If I continue to have say in this, wordexp() will never be in
> OpenBSD's libc. Perhaps if there is one open source project which
> refuses to have it, coders will continue avoiding use of wordexp().
Other than we know by the example of strlc* that doesnt' work ;)
Even though there are real re
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matthew Haub
> wrote:
> > This patch adds support for wordexp(3) and wordfree(3) to libc. These
> > functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX). The implementation
> > comes from NetBSD and uses a shell builtin, "wordexp", to perform the
> > expansion in lin
I think we should stand up to crap and not ever impliment it.
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matthew Haub
> wrote:
> > This patch adds support for wordexp(3) and wordfree(3) to libc. These
> > functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX). The implementation
> > comes from NetBSD and uses
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Matthew Haub
wrote:
> This patch adds support for wordexp(3) and wordfree(3) to libc. These
> functions conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX). The implementation
> comes from NetBSD and uses a shell builtin, "wordexp", to perform the
> expansion in line with the m
