On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:54:58AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:05:29 -0600
From: Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net
In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose does faithd(8) serve anymore?
I played with it
On 05/03/13(Tue) 09:03, David Hill wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:54:58AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:05:29 -0600
From: Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net
In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose
On 11 February 2013 07:05, Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net wrote:
In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose does faithd(8) serve anymore?
I played with it a bit over a decade ago, but don't recall having any use
for it in the last number of years.
I vote it gets tedu'ed.
I vote for it too, I
On 2013/02/11 00:05, Todd T. Fries wrote:
In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose does faithd(8) serve anymore?
ftp translation; but I doubt anyone uses that.
I played with it a bit over a decade ago, but don't recall having any use
for it in the last number of years.
I vote it gets
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:05:29 -0600
From: Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net
In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose does faithd(8) serve anymore?
I played with it a bit over a decade ago, but don't recall having any use
for it in the last number of years.
I vote it gets tedu'ed.
I fear
Penned by Mark Kettenis on 20130211 10:00.08, we have:
| Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:05:29 -0600
| From: Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net
|
| In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose does faithd(8) serve anymore?
|
| I played with it a bit over a decade ago, but don't recall having any use
|
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:05:29 -0600
From: Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net
In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose does faithd(8) serve anymore?
I played with it a bit over a decade ago, but don't recall having any use
