There have been internal discussions about OpenBSD also removing the pf
packet filter after the upcoming 6.5 release. Instead a switch to
using David Gwynne's new bpf filter will happen.
The benefits outweigh the drawbacks and the missing features will be
readily implemented in time for the 6.6 rel
r
Sent: Monday, 1 April 2019 4:01 PM
To: tech@openbsd.org
Subject: Removing PF
There have been internal discussions about OpenBSD also removing the pf
packet filter after the upcoming 6.5 release. Instead a switch to
using David Gwynne's new bpf filter will happen.
The benefits outweigh t
Den mån 1 apr. 2019 kl 07:30 skrev Ian McWilliam <
i.mcwill...@westernsydney.edu.au>:
> "peeing on, or even integration into baby mulching
> machines or atomic bombs to be dropped on Australia"
> That's a lot of missing features to implement in one release cycle.
>
>
I would like the license t
Yeah... i would love you all to give affect to that... +1 from me
claudioabout time!...
Thanks for articulating what i have been thinking all this time...
1/4/2019 will be a historic turning point for us
On Monday, 1 April 2019, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> There have been internal discussions
On Mon, 01 Apr 2019 07:01:03 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> There have been internal discussions about OpenBSD also removing the pf
> packet filter after the upcoming 6.5 release. Instead a switch to
> using David Gwynne's new bpf filter will happen.
> The benefits outweigh the drawbacks and the mi
Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Apr 2019 07:01:03 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > There have been internal discussions about OpenBSD also removing the pf
> > packet filter after the upcoming 6.5 release. Instead a switch to
> > using David Gwynne's new bpf filter will happen.
> > The benefi
Hi Claudio,
Claudio Jeker wrote on Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 07:01:03AM +0200:
> There have been internal discussions about OpenBSD also removing the pf
> packet filter after the upcoming 6.5 release. Instead a switch to
> using David Gwynne's new bpf filter will happen.
> The benefits outweigh the dr
On 2019/04/01 07:01, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> There have been internal discussions about OpenBSD also removing the pf
> packet filter after the upcoming 6.5 release. Instead a switch to
> using David Gwynne's new bpf filter will happen.
> The benefits outweigh the drawbacks and the missing features w
> Will the bpf JIT changes be done in time for 6.6? I have no doubt
> that "pfctl -p /dev/bfp" can be made to work in time but for a truly
> performant firewall we will need bpf JIT.
I wrote a vax BPF jit as a simple exercize some time ago, so all you
really need now is to implement vax-to-${AR
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:04:19PM -, Miod Vallat wrote:
>
> > Will the bpf JIT changes be done in time for 6.6? I have no doubt
> > that "pfctl -p /dev/bfp" can be made to work in time but for a truly
> > performant firewall we will need bpf JIT.
>
> I wrote a vax BPF jit as a simple exerci
On 4/1/19, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> There have been internal discussions about OpenBSD also removing the pf
> packet filter after the upcoming 6.5 release. Instead a switch to
> using David Gwynne's new bpf filter will happen.
> The benefits outweigh the drawbacks and the missing features will be
>
Will authpf be around?
On 4/1/19 3:18 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> While I support pf removal, I don't think bpf is the way to go.
>
> FreeBSD just removed their pf [1] so the code is up for grabs and you
> can import it with one weird trick.
>
> [1]
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-projects/2019-April/0133
Op 1-4-2019 om 18:03 schreef Kevin Chadwick:
On 4/1/19 3:18 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
While I support pf removal, I don't think bpf is the way to go.
FreeBSD just removed their pf [1] so the code is up for grabs and you
can import it with one weird trick.
[1] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 05:31:54AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Todd C. Miller wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 01 Apr 2019 07:01:03 +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >
> > > There have been internal discussions about OpenBSD also removing the pf
> > > packet filter after the upcoming 6.5 release. Instead a sw
On 4/1/19 9:03 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On 4/1/19 3:18 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
While I support pf removal, I don't think bpf is the way to go.
FreeBSD just removed their pf [1] so the code is up for grabs and you
can import it with one weird trick.
[1] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/s
On 2019-W14-1 19:12 -0700, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> Realistically, we need to move to the one true firewall-- iptables!
> Ideally, OpenBSD needs a firewall thats 'web scale' that can be
> administered from a PHP web based frontend that uses JSON message
> passing for clustering and failover.
Don
Op 2-4-2019 om 04:12 schreef Jordan Geoghegan:
On 4/1/19 9:03 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On 4/1/19 3:18 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
While I support pf removal, I don't think bpf is the way to go.
FreeBSD just removed their pf [1] so the code is up for grabs and you
can import it with one weird tr
For God sake, OpenBSD still there
Be Puffy!
Em ter, 2 de abr de 2019 às 03:51, Constantine A. Murenin
escreveu:
> On 2019-W14-1 19:12 -0700, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> > Realistically, we need to move to the one true firewall-- iptables!
> > Ideally, OpenBSD needs a firewall thats 'web scale' t
I thought you were going to deal with MD issues by adding support for SIMH into
6.6?
-Original Message-
From: owner-t...@openbsd.org On Behalf Of Miod Vallat
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 7:04 AM
To: tech@openbsd.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Removing PF
> Will the bpf JIT changes be d
Eichert, Diana wrote:
> I wrote a vax BPF jit as a simple exercize some time ago, so all
> you really need now is to implement vax-to-${ARCH} jit on an MD
> basis. This should be very easy to do as long as BPF does not get
> extended to use floating-point values.
I'm afraid you have to rewrite it
code Who needs
toggle switches anyway?
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Nasonov
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 1:38 PM
To: Eichert, Diana
Cc: tech@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Removing PF
Eichert, Diana wrote:
> I wrote a vax BPF jit as a simple exercize some ti
22 matches
Mail list logo