On 20 November 2014 at 15:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> When I decided to use in6_ifaddloop() for IPv4 I barely though about
> the name of the function. Recently mikeb@ told me that the name is
> confusing, especially because I'm trying to turn the "loopback hack"
> into "local routes".
>
> So her
When I decided to use in6_ifaddloop() for IPv4 I barely though about
the name of the function. Recently mikeb@ told me that the name is
confusing, especially because I'm trying to turn the "loopback hack"
into "local routes".
So here's a diff to rename these functions and to make them return
the
