On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:40:22PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:42:09AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 04/21/13 03:21, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 10:36:50AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi tech --
While doing some ports testing with clang, I
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:42:09AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 04/21/13 03:21, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 10:36:50AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi tech --
While doing some ports testing with clang, I came across the
binutils bug mentioned here:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 10:36:50AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi tech --
While doing some ports testing with clang, I came across the
binutils bug mentioned here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2004-07/msg0.html
Below is a backport of the commit mentioned later in
On 04/21/13 03:21, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 10:36:50AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi tech --
While doing some ports testing with clang, I came across the
binutils bug mentioned here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2004-07/msg0.html
Below is a backport
Hi tech --
While doing some ports testing with clang, I came across the binutils
bug mentioned here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2004-07/msg0.html
Below is a backport of the commit mentioned later in the thread. It
fixes the issue.
I was able to rebuild working kernels
On 3/2/2013 10:36 AM, Brian Callahan wrote:
Hi tech --
While doing some ports testing with clang, I came across the binutils
bug mentioned here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2004-07/msg0.html
Below is a backport of the commit mentioned later in the thread. It
fixes the
