On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:08:43PM -0500, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Donald Allen wrote:
> >> OpenBSD's pride in its man pages is justified, for the most part. But
> >> having recently decided to come back to OpenBSD after a
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Donald Allen wrote:
>> OpenBSD's pride in its man pages is justified, for the most part. But
>> having recently decided to come back to OpenBSD after a long hiatus, I
>> found myself completely baffled by how to get battery
Jason McIntyre:
hi donald. i'm not sure i exactly know what you want to do, but if
i run your program it gives me (almost) identical output to that
given by running "systat sensors" or "sysctl hw.sensors". i guess
that takes care of the idea of providing find-sensor-mibs in userland,
or making wha
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Donald Allen wrote:
> OpenBSD's pride in its man pages is justified, for the most part. But
> having recently decided to come back to OpenBSD after a long hiatus, I
> found myself completely baffled by how to get battery status
> information via sysctl(3). I use suckless.org's
tion via sysctl(3). I use suckless.org's dwm and there's a
> little chunk of C called dwmstatus that you can use to provide a
> periodic display of whatever you'd like (battery info, load averages,
> date/time) in the window manager's bar. While the sysctl(3) man page
>
unk of C called dwmstatus that you can use to provide a
periodic display of whatever you'd like (battery info, load averages,
date/time) in the window manager's bar. While the sysctl(3) man page
gives you a start on getting sensor data, it is not sufficient, in my
opinion; I think an example is
