On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
> I have done a fresh checkout of -current src, but I still get:
>
> # ld --verbose | grep randomdata
> PROVIDE (__openbsd_randomdata_start = .);
> .openbsd.randomdata :
> *(.openbsd.randomdata .openbsd.randomdata.*)
> PROVIDE (_
I have done a fresh checkout of -current src, but I still get:
# ld --verbose | grep randomdata
PROVIDE (__openbsd_randomdata_start = .);
.openbsd.randomdata :
*(.openbsd.randomdata .openbsd.randomdata.*)
PROVIDE (__openbsd_randomdata_end = .);
This does not match what is shown unde
> From: na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:20:36 + (UTC)
>
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > > $ cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils
> >
> > You'll want to do a
> >
> > $ make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper
>
> $ make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper obj
Arghh, yes. I blame m
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > $ cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils
>
> You'll want to do a
>
> $ make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper
$ make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper obj
> here first, otherwise you'll end up with crap in your source directory
> that's difficult to get rid of.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerbe
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:39:28 -0700
> From: Matthew Dempsky
>
> A few days ago I committed a change to binutils to add support for
> .openbsd.randomdata sections and then later converted libc to make use
> of them. It seems that at least armish is not happy with libc
> compiled using an out-
A few days ago I committed a change to binutils to add support for
.openbsd.randomdata sections and then later converted libc to make use
of them. It seems that at least armish is not happy with libc
compiled using an out-of-date binutils, so if you're following from
source be careful to update bi
