On 2023-05-18 00:14 +02, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> And why is this ip6_soiikey in the kernel anyway? I guess it is
> from a time when address configuration was done in the kernel.
> Could slaacd(8) just read /etc/soii.key?
Originally we implemented RFC 7217 for link-local addresses, too. The
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:56:13AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > On 18 May 2023, at 01:14, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:46:02PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> >> Introduce `ip6_soiikey_lock' rwlock(9) to protect `ip6_soiikey'. It
> >> accessed only by
> On 18 May 2023, at 01:14, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:46:02PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> Introduce `ip6_soiikey_lock' rwlock(9) to protect `ip6_soiikey'. It
>> accessed only by ip6_sysctl_soiikey() and ip6_sysctl() is the only
>> ip6_sysctl_soiikey() caller so
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:46:02PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> Introduce `ip6_soiikey_lock' rwlock(9) to protect `ip6_soiikey'. It
> accessed only by ip6_sysctl_soiikey() and ip6_sysctl() is the only
> ip6_sysctl_soiikey() caller so context switch is allowed here. Also
> remove unused
Introduce `ip6_soiikey_lock' rwlock(9) to protect `ip6_soiikey'. It
accessed only by ip6_sysctl_soiikey() and ip6_sysctl() is the only
ip6_sysctl_soiikey() caller so context switch is allowed here. Also
remove unused `oldkey' from ip6_sysctl_soiikey().
For IPV6CTL_MRTSTATS, IPV6CTL_MRTMIF and
